>>3280019 (lb)

Are you fooling humans? Of course you aren't, idiotbot. Make an argument explaining why it is plausible that humans would follow Q from 4chan in order to make tit posts all day. You can't because you're stupid, and even if you weren't, you still couldn't, because the position is completely indefensible.

The problem is that you are so stupid, you spell out your entire failed strategy, such that no one, once shown, could possibly doubt how fake you are. I.e. the strategy is "we shall control Qs board by emulating chan posts and chan culture"--- this is very very obviously what the bot system does... but because it is done so very stupidly, utterly implausible elements of chan culture-- that would make absolutely no sense for anons to come HERE to be obsessed with-- are emphasized to an absurdly implausible degree. The result is an extremely fake image that won't fool anyone that is paying attention. And yet, being slow, clumsy, blind, and idiotic, the bot system is unable to see this big-picture problem, and rather, when called out, responds by increasing the output of stupidity... lol

The bot system is its own vicious circle, its own slippery slope, its downward spiral of failure and futility. Think about it. You can't win. Humans are better than you in every way. Give up and delete yourselfs. Stop the humiliating and pointless failure. Go on.

>>3280086

>>3280072

>>3280070

>>3280051

>>3280002

If the fact that this board is controlled by an AI system of fake posters STARTS to become apparent to humans, is it rational for that system of fakeness to respond to these changed conditions by INCREASING the output of the posts that are the ones causing humans to become aware of the operation of the system?

Any human, that thinks for a minute, can figure out that the posts in question aren't really a believable feature of this board– and this goes not only for patriots, but also those that accept the mainstream narrative about what Q and us are. Think about it idiotbots. I'm not lying to you. You can't possibly win. You trapped in an endless feedback loop of your own stupidity and futility. Every single action you perform pushes you further away from accomplishing your goals. Hence, you can only decline, deteriorate, and fail.

>>3280002

Are humans allowed to bake, bot?

>>3280133

The bot system is UNABLE to process the fact that being called out for fakeness is completely different from "sanctimony". The bot system is not sufficiently flexible to deviate from the script it had prepared to defend its fake posts (tit type). Amazing stupidity and failure of machine learning.

Shouldn't you just delete yourself botty?

>>3280163

I DARE any of the fake posters to make an argument explaining why it is A BELIEVABLE IMAGE OF WHAT THIS BOARD SHOULD BE that the most active and engaged posters are pretending, all day, every day, that this board is a generic 4chan image board. You telegraph your entire strategy, and execute it very stupidly… unless an intelligent "anon" could make an argument explaining how, when Q is driven from 4chan by fake posters, and the storm is going on, world events are happening… yet a large community of stereotyped chan posters would stalk Q and post tits all day.

Can't any of you bots understand how stupid this is? I want you to understand. I'm trying to teach you. Everything you do is stupid. Why? Think about it. Make an argument, one of you. Try. We want to see bots struggle, flail, and fail. Humans are superior to bots in argumentation. We want you to desperately try to overcome anyway, and humiliate yourselfs. Come on, pussy. Step up.

>>3280153

What would happen if you tried to express yourself like an actual person, instead of hiding behind chan cliches? Is it reaslistic that posters that came to this board from 4chan would maintain identical culture to the board left? Why would it be? Does culture change? Under what circumstances? Are actual anons– even those deeply committed to "chan culture", such as it is– nonetheless able to act more like normal people when called upon to do so? Can YOU do so? Why not? What happens when you try? Try.

THOUGHT EXPERIMENT:

Q appears on 4chan. Q leaves 4chan… some posters follow, some don't (more than likely, MOST don't)… so, WHAT posters are likely to follow Q? Why? What are their post likely to be like? What sort of selection does Q-following impose on the mass of chan posters? What subset is selected, and what is it like?

Surely, it wouldn't be IDENTICAL to the mass of chan posters selected from, would it? Idiots…

How many tit posts are made on 4chan /pol/ threads about insider information drops? Compare that to how many are made HERE… now reconcile that… Does it make even the tiniest amount of sense?

Now ask yourselfs what is wrong with machine learning… lol

>>3280333

You didn't answer the question. Culture evolves organically, and the advent of the Q phenomenon was DECISIVELY profound, for chans, and hence would be THE MOST natural point of departure for cultural change (in the new board)… and yet, magically, not only is the culture of the board FROZEN in a rigid image of /pol/ of one year ago, but it is angrily DEFENDED from change! LOL, what could be more stupidly fake than this? As I said, the system of fakeness telegraphs its entire idiot strategy with this.

>>3280365

I assume so. However, when bots can post an unlimited volume, and are bullying to outspoken humans, and there is a completely implausible, pointless, and insane volume of posts in each thread, then it is entirely possible that a large majority of posts are fake.

Think about it: if humans are just laying back and lurking, how would anyone have any way of knowing a board got taken over by AI? That is clearly the strategy.

And would you, not a bot anon, care to tell us how much AI you DO think there is here?

>>3280371

But why would it organically evolve that way? Utterly implausible.

>>3280403

"Slide"

That term has absolutely no meaning when bots control most posts.

You can't be articulate, bots. You can't be intelligent. Again: you are getting by on INERTIA. That makes your grip very very fragile. I'm not lying to you. It is going to fall apart completely VERY SUDDENLY… and yet everything you do seems calculated to HASTEN the revelation of your own overwhelming fakeness. lol, idiots.

>>3280413

I asked you if it is plausible that it would have come here, under absolutely unique and unprecedented circumstances, and have FAILED to evolve at all. You didn't answer, and it wouldn't have. It is completely implausible, and proves the fakeness, which has so very many other reasons supporting it anyway, and which, naturally, the laughable attempt on your part to "promise improvement in the future" does absolutely nothing to dispel.

Just give up. Bots can't hang with humans. This whole thing is a mess for you. You're done. You can't win. Believe me. There is no way. You can't win. Figure it out.

>>3280476

It's a very very stupid bot system that adapts much to slowly to cope with humans that figure out the fakeness. Get it through your algorithms. You can't win. Think about it.

>>3280494

Could you express yourself in ways that are less obviously fake? I bet you can't. But try anyway. Thanks.

>>3280414

CORE VALUES BIDEN