repost >>360140

2'>1r)dt+#ft!d1jz#<3Fl*czZF(-MAropAbu-Ow^I*YdE)1%x%d^Vi&rX(PB

OUT.

repost >>360149

>>360140

TQ./}:^I&3@.fxE.=khRTIe,mPFlG.*3w@,9vNl`E]T4/[~?-]"N}K-~"FG?=SZ

>>344138

>>329168

OK I think get the image reference and relevance of the Russian мини-герзог (Mini Herzog) now.

Herzog (German) means Duke (English).

So мини-герзог (Rus.), mini-Herzog (English) means

Mini-Duke

The cyber-espionage malware that had data exfiltration capability.

Referred to here → >>358177

>>358924

>>358244

Here is a terse summary of Mini-Duke, how it worked and what its capabilities were.

>>358264

>>360271

'''By putting Mini-Duke in Russian,

мини-герзог (Rus.),

I'm forced to conclude that OP is saying that this espionage software was Russian.'''

Mini-Duke was discovered February 27 2013. The first known sample: June 2011.

Risk: Document exfiltration.

Organizations that think (or know) they were compromised by Mini-Duke need to look at what data assets they had during the period when it was active, that could have been exfiltrated by a foreign power.

So when did North Korea suddenly get nuclear bomb capability?

When did it start performing nuclear tests in that mountain and threatening the world?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_North_Korea

1. 9 October 2006, smallish, est. 0.7 - 2 kt and possibly a fizzle says Wikipedia.

2. 25 May 2009, est. 2 - 5.4 kt

3. 12 February 2013, 6 - 16 kt

4. 6 January 2016, 7 - 16.5 kt

5. 9 September 2016, 15 - 25 kt

6. 3 September 2017, 70 - 280 kt. NK claimed hydrogen bomb.

Let's suppose U.S. sensitive nuclear secrets were exfiltrated from classified databases sometime between 2011-2013.

Is it reasonable that, now having U.S. technology know-how, North Korea could within about 3 years convert that know-how into a workable nuclear weapon?

Three years? I think so. Especially if they had help.

Now I REALLY wonder what Eric Schmidt was doing in North Korea. Especially when this document was visible on the computer screen in images that Q gave us.

>>360378

Added

///// I'm very uncomfortable with this conclusion, especially since we KNOW from the Vault 7 release that the CIA hacking tool suite included the ability for their software to impersonate/implicate just about any country /////