>>367246

You saw my reply on the General thread, didn't you? I said

>>367415

> the code I'm reading, looks to be the code on which the collective mind "computer" would opeprate.

You're a flake, anon. No Hadoop code was posted. What they posted were simple UNIX shell commands that print out when an AIX computer boots, with the date, time, and all the processes that are started at boot time, I/O devices, etc.

We were also given a console output of some encryption commands, which show us which encryption keys (by name) are associated with securing particular datasets.

Your thought about

< collective mind "computer"

is not technical and is simply incorrect. Factual information has been obtained from the posts and speculation about a

< collective mind "computer"

is not productive.

If you're a shill you'll assert your point of view again.

If you're not a shill, just a sane anon lacking in knowledge of the area you spoke about, you'll let it drop and let people with deep computer background continue the dig over there.

God bless you, anon. Be well.

>>367409

If you want to look up some companies that have venture capital involvement with DWave Systems, go to this post and its replies >>364909 then start digging.

Names of people, CEOs and such, names that show up in different places, boards of directors, dates formed, you know what to do.

No one is asking you to do technical work for which you are unprepared. You can help in other ways.

>>367409

This is MAYBE the real deal.

Don't jump to conclusions.

There is plenty to be concerned about

but I trust that Q + company know

what they are doing. Our job is to

help them in whatever way they

need from us.

Not to succumb to irrational fears.

We want to learn facts, and ascertain

what can be extrapolated from the facts

to a high degree of probability.

Are you comfortable dealing in

probabilities instead of certainties, anon?

That's where we're at.

>>367380

Since you didn't link your last post, nobody has any idea what you are talking about.

This dig is not about Freemasons, at least not right now. Let's stay on topic.