I'm pretty skeptical on the whole Kavanuagh is a witess to bush crimes and is going to out the Bush dynasty. He would not be a component witness in such a prosecution and the SC judge ultimately hearing a case that might be appealed. Kavanaugh is going to respect the law - which is very broad in terms of Executive power primarily because of Bush. Kavanuagh is going to stand by the legal principles of bush - which happens to be the "terrorism" related precedents giving the POTUS immense power in times of war over enemy combatants. Which is why they are yelling out that he won't be "fair to litigants" and they will claim that he is biased and therefore when he affirms their sentences, that will be how they try to get out.
No chance
Yep and they definitely will. But there are certain assumptions that need to follow logic.
1.) If Q, MI, POTUS, Sessions, Huber, Horiwitz have it all, there is so much evidence it will be a totally open and shut case. This is particularly true in the military court because military law is way less protective than other courts.
2.) Who cares if they have this argument? Who do they make it to? There is no higher court. You have to have a higher court to invalidate something and this is going to be an argument made but only the brainwashed leftists could possibly make this after the evidence comes to light.
It all comes back to we have it all. What does that really mean?
YES NOTABLE