>>3306505
not necessarily from page views.
Besides, nothing unexpected or untoward about them lurking - it'd be considered journalism.
I would like to call for an addition to the dough.
We need an 'In Memorium' section, for those de-personed, de-platformed or banned/suspended, etc. in general from the web/social media or irreparably destroyed by leftist politics.
Keep a running tally within the dough, basically. Seeing the list every bread helps drive home the severity of censorship, particularly aggregated in one place.
Anyone second?
fine by me. But I still feel that the visual at the top of every bread would be much higher impact.
Very few (sadly myself included) don't check other threads very often.
Already evidence of why I feel it should be in the dough and not shunted off to a thread, out of sight.
it happens literally every rally.
Consider it mostly newfags, with a few shills weaponizing it to slide.
Not really helping posting walls of text in protest - ignore it and it goes away faster.
no consistent visibility means no real impact.
Hell, Wired has been posted as notables in multiple breads tonight alone and people still aren't aware.
Having a highly visible location that's sitting right there for everyone to see every bread will maximize impact, which is the point…
if you havn't been called a shill at least 50 times, you're still a newfag. If you have, you should be used to it - and know to just filter and move on.
the more you know ;)
That's your opinion (incidentally, mine too)
He was the 'test' to see if they could get away with it, as well as many do believe in him.
Still belongs.
I'll leave it to others to weigh in but personally, I felt you could see that coming from a mile away, even if we weren't in the middle of the censorship attacks.
another anon suggested a compromise between in the dough and off on another thread.
Keep the main list on another thread and only the most recent 5 (or so) in the dough.
I'm not arguing against it. I tend to disagree as she still has a voice - and it was predictable what would happen, even got off light really.
But It comes down to what we consider censored - I made the suggestion to collect the casualities in one place, I'm certainly not going to set artificial parameters on what we, as a group, feel the standard is.
agreed. fully agreed.
oh man… that fuggin grease is so damned hard to get washed off…
You end up still feeling greasy a week after having to mess with that shit
Good question - what is more important?
Quotes from the past? Or examples of direct attacks on our rights in the present?
Visibility should be extremely high.
I prefer the latest 5(ish) examples in dough and a thread for additional indepth info and full list.
unfortunately, that's been tried - and they shred pretty quickly. Causes more problems than they solve. Ditto with leather gloves, tried those too.
What seemed to work the best was desert sand - dry wash the shit off.
How do you explain away the fact that Kavanaugh was the one who lead the charge (successfully) to re open the investigation?
So they get hidden away in threads that only 2-5% of anons check regularly and beyond that, only another 5-10% ever check at all?
Look just in this bread here, there being people unaware that we lost Wictor a few days ago (not a fan myself, but hey) and Wired today.
'THIS' direct examples of daily attacks - this is what motivates people
Quotes only serve to keep already motivated ideologues … inspired?
I could not disagree more, sorry. It needs at least some level of constant visibility to keep it in the frontal cortex of every anon.
Besides, latest 5 to 10 (5 unless/until they ramp up in velocity of bans) takes up a total of 1 to 1.5 inches.
Sounds more like an attempt to hide the info to me, than to really recognize why it should be aggregated to begin with.
could work.
unfortunately most work done on military vehicles happens 50+ miles from the nearest PX and storage/cargo space is premium