I've been debating about posting anything about CBF's testimony, but wanted to add my two cents. Q knows what I do for a living. The technique we use is undoubtedly very similar to how I believe CBF (and other C_A victims/assets) are coached. In fact, I've said for years that what we do could be used for EXACTLY what CBF has done to Kavanaugh, but, honestly, with better effect.
Her testimony rang untrue for me on many levels, but the primary level is an emotional one. Using presuppositional apologetics (non-theological), if I presuppose that CBF actually had gone through exactly one of the many scenarios she described with K, I would expect the level of emotions at the surface to be considerably LESS than what she displayed (she actually is a very poor observer of human behavior, IMNHO). The 'psyche' likes to heal (psychological terms are useful, but completely innacurate). That's what our mind/spirit/bodies DO. They heal. 35-ish years is enough for her to have healed from such a trauma as (one of the many versions) she described. Especially if she had sought treatment. I'm not saying that there isn't residual emotion from such an experience, but we tend to "not want to go there" over and over.
How to be believable, then? Muh, I'm not giving up those secrets cuz (((they))) lurk here.
All I'm saying is, what I do professionally is directly related to why I do not believe CBF. She's not even what I would call decent at what she attempted. Suffice to say, if Meryl Streep wasn't going to prison, she'd have played the part with at least a little more intelligence. And they BOTH hate POTUS.
Sauce? Yeah, not doxxing muhself. I'm just very good at what I do.