>>3307520 (pb)
>53-47 Kavanaugh
No, that's your assumption.
>The cordial end belied what senators said had been one of the fiercest and most unpleasant confrontations in recent history, in which the Senate rebuffed a new President, rejected one of its former members and dragged onto the floor its dirty laundry of drinking among members.
Remember POTUS' comment last night about "Patrick Leahy - drink"?
Leahy was in the Senate during that time. No specific mention of him around the Tower hearings however.
Never stated that i didn't GET IT. Stated that you are making an assumption on what 53-47 refers to which may or may not be a correct one.
And then using that assumption as a basis for a possible "false prediction" which will be "ignored by most", acccording to another assumption that you are making.