can a clockfag please explain why the clock starts at the [:20] marker?

the first crumb has neither the minute or second time stamp as [:20]

I have a theory that a seconds clock would start on the [:28], and the a minutes clock would start on the [:44]

if there is a significance to the [:20], let me know

if not, I'll post my theoretical clocks (have them made, want to know a clockfag's thoughts)

it would probably fuck up a lot of things, but it could be used for specifically seconds/minutes clock graphics; and the normal clock would be used for both (I guess)

the [:20] makes no sense to me

>>3986818

wtf are you talking about

the first crumb is on the [:20] marker

is there a reason for that or is it just randomly started there?

>>3986913

can you answer this: >>3986481

not sure the other clockfag that replied is going to

>>3987177

>I'll assume you're new

no, the clock is just irrelevant to me, I'm curious so I asked

didn't know Rshills did clockfaggotry either, not a good sign to me

>>3986996

>>3987177

but that makes no sense to me, because the crumbs start before Q mentioned a "clock"

all good, thanks for the discussion

wait, you mean you started on 12/7 because the hour timestamp is 0??

>>3987454

because it happened on the 1st too

really trying to understand the methodology behind the clock

so I came here instead of general, too many holes in it for me to clockfag, my mind can't neglect them

just for the fuck of it

well I tired

keep on doing whatever the fuck you're all doing

>>3990388

that was the clock starting on the 10 days of darkness, which ended on the 17th

didn't think thats what clockfags meant by that, Q refers to the clock many times after that

many think that specific 10 day clock was just that, a clock for 10 days

I thought there was a better reasoning on that

but thanks clockfags