Anonymous ID: e1ce1f Nov. 10, 2018, 7:52 p.m. No.3844160   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6560 >>2784

>>3782199

An update for clock blanks & tweets for those using them.

A dozen days roughly until 11/22 – if necessary, I'll probably not be extending the clock for its increasing size, instead have a second clock starting off at 10/03 or so, such that both have an overlap.

Will think about how to solve this problem for these blanks, as well as in QClockView.

Anonymous ID: e1ce1f Nov. 12, 2018, 11:32 p.m. No.3881349   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2784 >>6614

>>3873122

Not much of a surprise, actually, to see the shills in here as well in larger numbers. Been wondering what's holding them back, after following what's going on in the General these last days.

Trust at least the "old" regulars nonetheless will recognize each other – for all the other newly arriving anons: Read the old breads, think twice before you post and try to contribute meaningfully. No one will take you seriously in here if you don't!

 

Adding latest update for blanks & tweets. Looks like the Three-Timezone HTML is up to date, and has all the post despite Q deleting a couple of them pretty fast – that's for those using the QClockView, and who might have trouble updating their post archive w/o the /PF/ bread.

Anonymous ID: e1ce1f Nov. 13, 2018, 4:09 p.m. No.3891625   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3901

>>3890751

>I am either an idiot or a shill and will now go KMS

Hard to say from a single post and w/o the post of the anon you're referring to, tbh.

So don't be too fast with the "KMS". Instead, maybe you can explain what you mean when you use angles measured in Radians from the 3 o'clock position (or why not use gons)?

Anonymous ID: e1ce1f Nov. 13, 2018, 6:47 p.m. No.3893984   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4547

>>3893901

As a scientist, I know what a radial coordinate system in regular math looks like. Still missing the link to why radians should be the units to use. Angles so far have never played any role (apart from the "natural" order of angles prescribed by what a "clock" is). So why radians (and not gons, for example)?

Anonymous ID: e1ce1f Nov. 13, 2018, 7:49 p.m. No.3894744   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5035 >>5160

>>3894547

First attempts on the clock were in Jan or Feb (intense tries) … I was working on the clock back then already amongst others, but I got the feeling the topic was "cut off" by so-called "helpers" (posts like "let's not focus on the clock but let's rather do this ….").

I may be wrong attributing this to "helpers", but the initial drive went away back then, until May when OG clockfag "pushed" it, and I created the spiral calendar-clock. So the clock itself is only 6 months old or so.

If Q team would wanna have things known, they could always give hints or "direct" us in a subtle way – not like we wouldn't be susceptible to that (I myself thought I'd be working on a "decoding scheme" for more than two weeks night & day, without much use …).

So, in essence, I don't think we're late (except the rabbit always is late) … All good things will come in their time.

Anonymous ID: e1ce1f Nov. 13, 2018, 8:52 p.m. No.3895452   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3895160

>Q/Qteam are always helping

Haven't made that clear enough: Yes they are – we wouldn't have the "clock" if they weren't. And how could I not listen to any call, when "light" & "truth" and learning are mentioned?

So, no reason to thank anyone – all of us who hear it are only following the call of "Mother Abigail".

It might not relate much, in most parts, nonetheless it feels like it's related to us trying to figure out that "rainbow connection" ….

Genesis 9:12-13