>>3894547
First attempts on the clock were in Jan or Feb (intense tries) … I was working on the clock back then already amongst others, but I got the feeling the topic was "cut off" by so-called "helpers" (posts like "let's not focus on the clock but let's rather do this ….").
I may be wrong attributing this to "helpers", but the initial drive went away back then, until May when OG clockfag "pushed" it, and I created the spiral calendar-clock. So the clock itself is only 6 months old or so.
If Q team would wanna have things known, they could always give hints or "direct" us in a subtle way – not like we wouldn't be susceptible to that (I myself thought I'd be working on a "decoding scheme" for more than two weeks night & day, without much use …).
So, in essence, I don't think we're late (except the rabbit always is late) … All good things will come in their time.