Anonymous ID: 0a6aec Feb. 10, 2018, 7:16 p.m. No.332748   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2752 >>2762 >>2765 >>2767

What's the prevailing anon-backed theory on what the [5], [e], [-] messages mean?

 

This fag is of the mind that it's indecipherable until further crumbs are dropped, but would like to see if others have some better sauce.