>>3322157

"They did stress that the source who provided information to the FBI’s Russia case was not previously known to congressional investigators."

Something tells me ]WE[ knew.

Let me think. Who doesn't want that FISA warrant DECLAS again?…

>>3322426

>>3322453

Matt Walsh is hardly "them." But I'll take it. A lot of people listen to him that might not be huge Trump fans.

>>3322534

"…there was another source giving information directly to the FBI, which we found the source to be pretty explosive," said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

"explosive"?…RR? Nah… I'm thinking…bigger.

>>3322752