New Evidence Eliminates Christine Blasey Ford’s Residual Credibility
Personally, I only needed to see the first pictures to know she was a fraud wearing prosthetic makeup. Look at that neckline which Error Level Analysis does not call out as being manipulated though her eyeglass rims, lips and hair were (AP was the sauce) - pic related
–
"A sworn statement released by a man alleging to be Ford’s former boyfriend appears to have answered one very important question. During her testimony last week, why did sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell ask Ford if she had ever helped someone prepare for a polygraph? It was such an out-of-nowhere question, a seeming waste of time."
Ford answered that she had “never” helped anyone prepare for a polygraph.
Well, now we likely know why. The Senate Judiciary Committee might have known about this former boyfriend, and that under penalty of imprisonment, he would tell them Ford once used her skills in psychology to help a friend prepare for a polygraph.
If this is true, Ford could be guilty of perjury."
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/10/03/nolte-new-evidence-eliminates-christine-blasey-fords-residual-credibility/
archive:
http://archive.fo/NUvMp
See ELA analysis and other image info here:
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=1e9b32c7f649868b954d095486e6de7853ea4f03.47963&show=hidden