Cordiah May be the source that Meadows refered to in article as “explosive” and unknown.
Let’s see what Woods Procedure files show when Sessions testifies tomorrow!
Damnit… CORDISH
Can’t wait to see this guy roll on Sheila!
But Coska isn’t listed working for her on LinkedIn… look at his two buddies .. Schumer’s office.
Hmm
For all you Wizards and Warlocks..
Engorgio!
Caption:
“Ok.. so I had one too many beers last night! But when I find those Jew fuckers that shaved much stache, I’m gonna.. I’m gonna.. well.. I’m gonna burn those motherfuckers down!”
Dear Mr. KleineSchwartzenKatz:
We accept your apology, but respectfully ask that you join us for a little celebration to commemorate your coming out and truthful disclosure.
To honor you, we will bake a beautiful, giant torte! Yes! A Schwartzwalden Kirsche Torte! We missing one ingredient — you! And as our guest of honor, please stop by to help us finish this lovely dessert. Our Bakerei is located near Buchenwald.. you can’t miss it! Just look for the big ovens that mark our property! Just knock on the door and if no one answers, step right it and we’ll be sure to give you a warm reception!
Thanks so much!
Warmest regards,
Chancellor H (your fren)
Remember April is when Obama appointed Crowdstrike to his cyber commission and DNC hired them to sit and watch while DNC data was later breached haha. So the idea is that even then the plot to blame Russia for hacks, and to discredit Trump, was in motion. Not bc of GOP, but bc they had to keep everything else hidden with friendly president.
Here is link to texts: https://www.scribd.com/document/370966192/Strzok-Page-texts Sorry cannot screen shot them all bc time but here are exact page numbers and dates involved:
Starting page 217 dated 04-09-16 a text refers to "THE STORM COMING" oh yes it doooooes my pedes. And a note that "guidance was received" in a very opaque statement.
Page 291: someone bitching very angrily "It was deeply wrong given what I'd already been asked to do."
04-10-16 page 220 "I'm not sure I want to be part of this," rather plaintively
04-14-16 page 222 reference to NZ trip and I assume this refers to the NZ, one of the FIVE EYES countries for intel sharing
Page 223–THIS IS critical to me bc MOFFA has come up in another text with terse mention of his document and 'hi or low' which I assume refers to pricing (in another post of mine today). In this text, MOFFA is again mentioned along with their need to convey legal reasons "why we need extraordinary measures" (!)
04-26-16 page 225 asking for explanation why a "taint team isn't sufficient"–see this link for definition of taint team https://www.wilmerhale.com/pages/publicationsandnewsdetail.aspx?NewsPubId=94347 Taint team is
These groups of reviewing prosecutors and agents are referred to as "taint teams" because their purpose is to shield the government from a defense motion to suppress electronic record evidence based on an argument that the prosecution and investigating team was "tainted" by viewing electronic records it had no right to see.
05-08-16 Page 238: GUCCIFER is mentioned….with some redactions.
05-15-16 page 248 there is discussion of listing email violations like Petraeus simply to show those prosecuted situations were different bc info was transmitted to someone–intentionally leaving out more serious cases where retention issues are involved
05-24-16 page 257 text about new story about feds investigating Terry McAuliffee monies "This isn't good." (you'd think FBI agents would be thrilled that feds were investigating baddies)
06-08-16 page 263 This is text where someone is really really pissed about "consent letters" mind you this is leading up to Clinton interview and whatnot so i presume related to that. Do not know who "her" is in the text–HRC? Loretta Lynch? But she has demands such as excluding agents from review of records.
and finally–get this my friends: 06-08-16 page 263 a note of "andy" TAKING MOFFA TO WHITE HOUSE with him mind you this MOFFA person is showing up in various terse mentions throughout
Spez to add that Moffa is Jonathan C Moffa I presume, who was in small group given cc of Comey speech to review and below are some finds like his trip to WH–McCabe not mentioned in log. I find it fascinating how his name really has not come up before and suddenly he is ALL OVER these texts in sigificant way, referring to his document, and the high-low thing, etc so I definitely want more on his role
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/james-comey-fbi-clinton-emails-drafted-statement-686140%3famp=1
Anyone able to read lips?
The clip going around of Shiela Jackson Lee pulling envelope from beneath her blouse and handing to Ford’s atty… looks like he did a hand-off back to her also.
But the slow-mo — someone might be able to read her lips to know what she said. I can make out “want to…”.. but that is all.
Here ya go
Moffa left