>>3325930 ob
>>3325960 ob
Yes, USMCA has clear national security implications which probably drove the manner in which negotiations played out for public consumption.
Turns out that CA's PM was predictable and unknowingly served as stooge. Previous PMs stepped in to advise behind the scenes: SH and BM (JC curiously kept at distance).
US has veto over trade agreements between CA and or MX and .
No backdoor into US market.
Also may impinge on future deals modeled on U1.