>>3331878 (pb)

>>3331903 (pb)

So, "Iran Deal" provided some funding for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard which had operatives (Mossad?) providing Bibi with info that showed up in his PowerPoint presentation which detailed Iran's nuclear program, which is currently getting decimated along with ISIS.

This is the same ally that missile fucked GZ in Syria so that we couldn't investigate that what they actually hit were targets that we thought were what they say they were. We must be getting really close to the part where the tail isn't wagging the dog anymore, because counter-terrorism efforts on American soil being ramped up sounds awfully close to a full on admission that their operatives are going to focus more on US targets. Typically, Anti-terrorism measures are what's focused on here at home, but this letter has a tone of imminent preparedness to counter efforts.

That's a bit revealing of the current situation. Seems to me like the Graham line-of-questioning is taking on a fresher approach to current situations instead of implying actions that may have already taken outside of public scope.

Very interesting.