If you know the Bible that well, you may be ready to interpret it differently.
It has an awful lot to say about even what we are all here doing now.
You have the wrong (YOU). I've probably done a lot more work here (since October) than you have.
Well, okay.
Right after Solomon the tribes were divided into two nations, Judea and Israel (the ten).
The land to the north was Israel.
The land the Jews call Israel today is not the land of Israelite promise.
That was the northern area.
Their thinking was to prevent the ten tribes from even knowing an
end-time promise of "new governance" even exists for them.
But we are all creating that now where we are.
No, it doesn't. I only described 1/100th of the picture.
They never had Jewish identity. They were Israelites, and they became the nations they were promised to become throughout Western Europe right after their captivity. These were the "twelve tribes scattered abroad" James would address in his latter, and the sheep that heard the masters voice and rose to world power because of it.
No, it is WAY more supported, but by Scripture rather than man's opinion.
There has long been a broad road (for commercial theology, churches) and a very narrow road that is far more true to the Word.
I may have seen that. There is very good material about it.
LV really is the place to start red-pilling / truth campaigning.
It's also at the front of everybody's minds, still.
So, this may be like the next phase, which is us?
You could be right here.
Okay. Well, at least you agree.
There is tremendous value in sacred texts nobody knows for being too simple minded.
This is why you never hear of it too, because preachers can only sell one - the easy version.
It is the difference between the "letter of the law" and that of the "pneuma" (breath).
The former is history and irrelevant, the latter is present and active and vital.
>>335403
>For what is 'right' or 'truth', we have to dig at least 110+ years into our history as a people and civilization.
120 to be exact. To the protocols.
As far as what matters, it comes down to the difference between two different ways of using sacred texts. There are points of change for how they should be used, which are appointed by the very authors who wrote them. The OP pdf in the Snow White thread is goes into this the best, and the last pages of it reveal much of how/what we are all missing these days about our own point in history, and why.