>>334755

Agreed. I've seen some of the stupidest shit lately, to the point that I'd started to believe that the shills had changed tactics. I've definitely seen an effort to try and discredit this board. Not saying it's always on purpose, or even most of the time…but trying to get Q to push for an end to women's suffrage? That's meant to drive people away and shut their minds. Same with the "it's the Jews" BS. The Rothschilds are no more "the Jews" than the Clinton and Bush's are "the Whites" or Obama "the Blacks."

Divisiveness and identity politics are a tool of the globalists. If you're trying to bring it here, you're either one of them or beholden to them. It has nothing to do with this work.

>>334799

the news isn't "the news" anymore; it delivers "the thoughts." It's no longer about giving the public the facts and letting them decide for themselves–it's no longer providing a service, in other words. What it's really doing is telling us what to think.

Maybe it's because of the 24 hr news cycle, but that started with Ted Turner–a globalist. Ultimately, the news now serves only to push the propaganda of those that own the media.

Here's another thought: because these outlets are owned by people and corporations with diverse interests, the owners might decide that it's better to risk losing money on the news station than, say, their pharmaceutical interests. So why not convince your anchors to "see" things a certain way? Since the news doesn't need ratings to pay them (checks come from the globalist owners), who cares if people think the coverage is unfair?

They no longer need us to trust them.

>>334994

Right–their bosses, and those that have sway over their bosses.

It would really be nice if the media were required to be self-sufficient. Someone like Soros can easily keep paying them to spread lies, even with zero viewership. They can keep throwing huge banquets and stack judges for meaningless award ceremonies celebrating 'brave' newscasters with the 'right' perspective s. Meanwhile, real reporters (such as Cheryl Atkinson) with integrity are left in the cold.

But it's not just reporters, is it? We've come to accept that it's -every- industry. Want to rise up in Silicon Valley? Don't speak about your faith. Want to make it as an actress? Work on your blowjobs, not your range. I have a cousin that never could hold a job in San Francisco. He somehow lands a good one, then reveals to me that he's been dressing like a woman and prostituting himself.

>>335104

That's not a breakdown. That's "I don't have anything lined up, and I need work. Let me show the masters how loyal I am."

It's counterpart, "Hey motherfuckas, Trump is okay" means "I'm ready to retire now."

>>335138

It's almost certainly built in. A lot of what they've mentioned re: spectre and meltdown sounds like they've discovered an exploit (plausible deniability). This video talks about hidden (unlisted, unmentioned) opcode:

https: //youtu.be/KrksBdWcZgQ

I'd assumed it was brokered by some US government entity, but now I'm not so sure.

>>335166

Ok