>>3346620

You will be wanting this.

From what I gathered, the image is meant to make image recognition software/AI falsely identify something.

I think this does it by introducing edges and noise patterns that fuck with the recognition algorithms.

I would suggest putting the png file somewhere on your meme in a large enough size such that it takes up 12-15% of the total image. That should be sufficient to keep the resolution at a level that isn't overly pixelated and is still picked up by the IRS/Ai.

Would like feedback from Twitter anons who use this to see how often they feel like they get shadow banned bases off image alone.

>>3346750

The image uses some form of stenography which I have yet to figure out.

I know it's been around since the early days on 4Chan, there was a programme to make them easier but I never was able to get a hold of it.

It wasn't until later I saw a picture that used it as well of pepe smoking a blunt, don't think I have it on this machine.

>>3346966

If you did your due diligence you would know that particular png comes FROM the creator of that pdf. But obviously you don't think or do any digging before mouthing off.

That particular image is specifically designed to alter the AIs perception of ANY object, the png itself cannot be determined and is used BECAUSE it cannot be detected by the algorithms.

Now scurry along and go do some real research or head back to your shill handler