Anonymous ID: a77fa5 Oct. 5, 2018, 3:22 p.m. No.3353512   🗄️.is đź”—kun

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Trump administration is actively considering waivers on sanctions it will reimpose next month for countries that are reducing their imports of Iranian oil, a U.S. government official said on Friday.

 

The administration withdrew from a deal over Tehran's nuclear program in May and is unilaterally reimposing sanctions on Iran's crude oil consumers on Nov. 4. The sanctions aim to force Tehran to stop its involvement in conflicts in Syria and Iraq and halt its ballistic missile program. Iran says it has abided by the 2015 nuclear deal, which was struck with five other world powers, besides the United States.

 

The administration is "in the midst of an internal process" of considering exceptions called SRE waivers, or significant reduction exemptions, said a government official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

It was the first time a U.S. official said the administration was in the process of considering waivers. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in India last month that the administration would consider waivers and that some buyers of Iranian oil would take a "little bit of time" to unwind their trade with Iran.

 

White House National Security Adviser John Bolton said on Thursday that the administration's objective was that there be no waivers and "exports of Iranian oil and gas and condensates drops to zero." He added that the administration would not necessarily achieve that.

 

The administration is "prepared to work with countries that are reducing their imports on a case-by-case basis," the official said.

The comments followed news that India, Iran's No. 2 oil customer after China, will buy 9 million barrels of Iranian oil in November. It was an indication that India will continue purchasing crude from Iran, despite the Trump administration's push to get countries to stop their purchases.

 

https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2018-10-05/us-actively-considering-waivers-on-iran-oil-sanctions

Anonymous ID: a77fa5 Oct. 5, 2018, 3:26 p.m. No.3353579   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3724 >>3924 >>4022

October 5 at 7:17 AM

NEW DELHI — When the United States enacted a series of sanctions in retaliation for Russia’s alleged interference in U.S. elections, the goal was to punish an adversary, not to penalize friends.

But that is exactly what could happen as India — a country that the United States has sought to cultivate as a strategic partner — moves ahead with a major $5 billion weapons purchase from Moscow.

On Friday, during an official visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin to New Delhi, India signed a contract to buy five S-400 Triumf antiaircraft missile systems from Russia.

In theory, such a transaction will expose Indian entities and officials to U.S. sanctions under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act. The legislation, which was passed last year, mandated penalties for countries doing significant business with Russia’s defense and intelligence sectors.

 

Now the crucial question is whether President Trump will grant a waiver to India for the purchase of the S-400. Last month, the United States imposed sanctions on an arm of the Chinese military for buying Russian fighter planes as well as equipment for the S-400.

The United States and India have drawn closer in recent years as both countries cast a wary eye on China’s growing influence in the region. But the tussle over the Russian missile system represents a case of conflicting priorities.

From the U.S. perspective, the sanctions are a necessary and appropriate response to Russian interference in the U.S. elections — and Washington expects allies to assist in that effort.

India, meanwhile, is keen to deepen ties with the United States but not at the cost of severing a long-standing defense relationship with Russia. More broadly, it wants the independence to determine its own approach to countries like Iran and China, where its interests may differ substantially from those of the United States.

 

India “cannot be put in a position where, in effect, Washington decides what kind of relationship they have with these other countries,” said Ashley Tellis, a former senior George W. Bush administration official and longtime India expert. “That’s where Delhi will draw a bright red line.”

 

(pic) Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, right, hugs Russian President Vladimir Putin before their meeting in New Delhi, India, on Oct. 5. (Yuri Kadobnov/AP)

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2018/10/05/us-wants-punish-russia-election-meddling-india-is-caught-crossfire/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.589afd62a938

Anonymous ID: a77fa5 Oct. 5, 2018, 3:30 p.m. No.3353638   🗄️.is đź”—kun

FDA revokes use of seven food additives

 

The US Food and Drug Administration on Friday revoked the use of seven food additives after environmentalists and food safety experts presented data showing six of the synthetic flavoring substances and flavor enhancers caused cancer in laboratory animals. The seventh synthetic flavor, styrene, was removed because manufacturers no longer use it.

 

The FDA decision is "an important victory for consumer confidence," Laura MacCleery, policy director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said in a statement. MacCleery added that the FDA action was a response to a 2016 petition and a subsequent lawsuit asking for an FDA response.

 

The six substances are synthetically derived anibenzophenone (benzophenone), ethyl acrylate, eugenyl methyl ether (methyl eugenol), myrcene, pulegone and pyridine. Benzophenone can no longer be used in rubber articles that come into contact with food, the FDA said.

 

Companies who use these six additives will have 24 months to identify suitable replacements in food products, the FDA said.

 

The additives, said MacCleery, were deemed safe by the FDA in 1964 and have been commonly used in candy, ice cream, chewing gum, baked goods, drinks and other foods since that time. The US Department of Health and Human Services' National Toxicology Program tested the additives and found they caused cancer in two species of animals, according to the petition.

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/health/nutrition/fda-revokes-use-of-seven-food-additives/ar-BBO088d?li=BBnbfcL&ocid=LENOVOSIGDHP17