>>335789
>Expand your thinking.
>Is a mathematical reality a simulation with natural law for its physics?
>
Then you end with this. You've got some sorting out to do.
>God
Math is life, life is math, life is frequency, frequency is life. The Law of Nature TRUMPS everything, which in the end is the downfall of humans.
Life is circular, there are 12 dimensions, you can travel between timelines and dimensions which exist simultaneously.. reality is a creation of thought, which is why..memes work…..
Bucky was a dreamer trapped in possibility instead of what is. It is completely understandable, but an inherent place of stuckness…true freedom comes from knowing it is what it is because each individual has to go through their own process…that NATURE must go through her own process and the more hands on you are for yourself and the more hands off you are for others…the easier that process will be.
The world cannot be changed, that in and of itself drives many to suicide…when being at peace with the NATURE of humans and not attempting to overwrite the Law of Nature with Natural Law.
Like the lion and the lamb the egoistic human also has a "nature" that simply cannot be overwritten like a computer hard disk. It is as impossible a task to do that, as it would be to dangle a lamb in front of a lion and tell him not to eat it–there's a better way to eat, here, have a carrot.
Humans are continually trying to outdo Nature, and time and time again she's said…nope.
WHEN you can finally come into knowing with that and release attachment to changing the world because YOUR vision is the right one, the internal dialogue become less messy.
Bucky's internal dialogue and struggle was solely miserable due to his desire to change everyone else…to convince them they too could see the world like he did. He was miserable and contemplated suicide because he could not change OTHERS…because the world did not show up for him the way he could envision it.
You'd do well to study Eudaimonia…all the old philosophers debated this attainment of happiness being tied to virtue, then struggled to define virtue…when in fact happiness and virtue are individual ..a serial killer who attains true happiness and peace the moment he watches the light go from someone's eyes at his own hands…is no less happy than the person who attains happiness by watching puppies play. Is he less virtuous OR is it possible to be happy without virtue. And yet the puppy player will not hesitate to tell the serial killer that he cannot possibly be as happy as himself… can you see now, in that example..the nature of humans?
While we are all interconnected, we are NOT one.
Oil and water don't mix…you cannot have seekers mixed with resisters…it is not conducive to arriving at solutions. Writing a math equation on a board and studying it only works if other people stop erasing it each time you leave the room…or argue continually that 1+2=5 when you know it does not and all the explaining and proof in the world is never going to convince them any different.