U.S. objective by 2030 should be to create a divided China, one that looks something like 10th-century China did with lots of mutually antagonistic regions. No one Chinese kingdom of that time had so many resources under its control that it could threaten nations outside of China.

(pic related)

Breaking up China is the USA's right, in light of Chinese perfidy in attempting to turn the USA against itself by cultivating factional conflicts. There is no shame is America pushing China into civil war.

As the video to the left shows, there is nothing fixed about China's borders and any which way China might divide today would be sure to have some historical roots.

>>3360347

pic wouldn't load

This is a pic of 10th century China… the way it ought to look, roughly speaking, by 2030.

>>3360379

The issues of Chinese communism and black/satanic/luciferian occultism are intertwined though.

The communist leaders of China, Vietnam, Burma, and Laos, the quasi-communists under Huen Sen in Cambodia… and probably some I'm not as familiar with… are doing satanic occult rituals on a daily basis. Yes they typically use Chinese incantations instead of Enochian ones; yes sometimes their sigils are different than in the European magickal tradition… but it's all the same stuff when you boil it all down to essentials.

Chinese communist ritual occultism also has a lot in common with West African and Caribbean 'voodoo' type rituals. The politburos never discuss this publicly but it's happening behind closed doors in Asia all the time.

One wrinkle to the whole China story relates to the Space Force and the (possible) introduction into public view of breakthrough defense technologies.

We know that the Clintons, NoName, and many others participated in selling off many of America's key military technologies to the Chinese and actors friendly to them like Iran and NK. At first glance, this would make any direct military confrontation with China very dicey as we'd be going up against some of our very own military tech. And certain technologies may have been modified or improved upon by the Chinese so that they're actually better than the American version.

However, as students of the Secret Space Program have long known, there exist whole tiers of U.S. Military technology above and beyond anything you will see covered in Jane's Defence Weekly. Stuff way more advanced beyond nuclear weapons; we're quickly into the arena of antigravity, superluminal travel, scalar weapons, quantum computing, timeline wars, and things even the known whistleblowers have never mentioned.

Up until now, there has rarely been any need for the USMIL to use this stuff publicly (in Afghanistan, Iraq, or Syria for instance) because their objectives could feasibly be accomplished with conventional tech.

If it comes to a shooting war with China, that may actually provide the impetus to unleash some of that next-gen weaponry that is far beyond anything the Clintons were ever in possession of and hence able to sell to the Chinese. Some of the new technologies might be deployable in a way that allows the DoD to maintain plausible deniability about their existence; but other tech might be impossible to hide.

If such tech were to have peaceful civilian applications, there may be something of a silver lining to what the Clintons did.

>>3360733

It would be lovely to see Vietnam become a U.S. ally again. To do so will require Hanoi to cease brainwashing its children that the USA is the Great Satan.

While the Vietnamese Politburo could agree to do such a thing, they would be reluctant to do so and would face a lot fo backlash from their academic establishment. But IMO it must be done.

>>3360741

The Chinese are cunning and well-organized (oftentimes much better than Americans), but they have at least two major weaknesses: their lack of creativity, and their arrogance.

Somehow the USA needs to exploit those weaknesses to achieve a situation where China can no longer effectively do the cabal's bidding.

>>3360775

I suspect that some of the breakthrough tech the USMIL might need in a shooting war with China has been sequestered away in Unacknowledged Special Access Programs which even POTUS and Mattis don't have access to.

So, one rationale for creating the Space Force would be to procedurally bring those technologies under Constitutional authority and hence into POTUS's arsenal as commander-in-chief.

It sounds like this bimbo at the Air Force needs to be gotten rid of ASAP.

>>3360853

It's such a stark contrast how the anons on this board would jump at the chance to make a meaningful contribution by following a lawful, patriotic order from the President.

And yet this bimbo, who could do such much for the country and so easily with the power she wields, is stonewalling the greatest President in living memory. Maybe she wants to become an enemy combatant….

>>3360891

That's the one!

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/10/04/trump-may-fire-air-force-secretary-over-space-force-pushback-report.html