>07:33:33
swordanon a mason?
Kav is sooooo cool. Anon like us.
And forget the sacrifices of our vets, focus on Kav's sacrifice. His life was totally devastated. His wife! His little girls!
He deserves the position he is being appointed to. We OWE IT to him. He is ENTITLED to it.
Kav's 45 min of tears and sniffling convinced me he is the man with the compassion necessary to serve on the SCOTUS
here, I'll cry and sniffle for 45 min.
Then you have to believe me!
"I am entitled to this position on SCOTUS"
look go how Clarence Thomas handled it for a correct application of righteous indignation
Kav's performance was simple faggotry.
learn the difference, maybe this embed can help.
to each their own. Of course other anons are attacking me for my point. So I commend you for your measured response.
then here's a glowing faggot for you:
yeah, they play by different rules. don't get butthurt about it.
This is the consequence of choosing good over evil. accept it.
If you follow Q at all you would agree there is a strong hint the clintons will get what's coming to them.
I am using the Clarence Thomas video to show anons how to handle a situation and avoid crying and sniffling like an overprivileged prep boy for 45 min.
I know people (some dead) who have sacrificed more and cried less for the camera.
you may be too new to understand the term
"shitpost"
or know what mouldy bread is.
yes, there is a filter function, but there is a benefit in educating a community where filtering is not as necessary.
I believe that is all that he is trying to advocate.
i watched it too (there should be more views imho if q is telling us to watch it) and feel the same.
you're new here so you don't realize that your id is the same for this bread (although there are things you can do to change it)
So it is easy to see that you just call people names when you make a bad argument that gets countered by a good argument.
Don't be so butthurt newfag, try to make an actual counter-argument.
the first step is believing in yourself.
I thought that once sealed, they were not on the docket. so I don't think the holdup would be overworked judges.
link to the guy i linked to not me. I didn't make the comparison. I was quoting, faggot.
hence the "quotes" for the phrase "smarter than Q"
you're not one of the top candidates, are you?
that's a lot of judges… and no leaks?
How????
there's so many judges, there's got to be one on (theirside) so sees a stange pattern and squeals.
55k, you'd think there'd be some leak, but I like your theories as to why not.
trust HUBER