The premise of this theory relies on the first event.
What I do not believe has been considered is that James Wolfe was probably leaked an inaccurate FISA.
It as well relies on the assumption that no one would of thought of this scenario.
If the FISA documents Wolfe was given were inaccurate, then the media would not pursue this avenue further.
Collyer in her letter stated that a copy did not have to come from the Court.
Instead a copy could be supplied by the DOJ.
I suspect that Collyer knows there are 2 FISA docs which are not the same.
That is the reason she tossed it back to the DOJ.
The Court wants to know if they have both copies.
I suspect they do.
Rosenstein testified somewhat to this when he stated that "was not the one he signed".