>>33525

No games found with this position

on 365chess.com/search_position.php?not_found=1&pgn_search=&pgn_move=0

>>33706

I wonder if it's a game he's playing now or if it's a Grandmaster game; I'm firing up Chessbase LiveBook as we speak…

>>33676

Chessbase LiveBook has this position with 2820 visits, and chess engines give White a clear advantage. Qf3 is a choice; and a4 is another

>>33665

Analysis by Stockfish 010118 64:

1.a4 c5 2.dxc5 Bxc5 3.axb5 axb5 4.Qf3 Qxf3 5.gxf3 Ra8 6.Rxa8 Rxa8 7.Bd5 Rc8 8.Bf4 Rd8 9.Be4 b4 10.c4 g6 11.g5 Be7 12.Bd5 Kg7 13.Be5+ f6 14.Bd4 h6 15.gxh6+ Kxh6 16.Bb6 Rd6 17.Be3+ Kg7 18.Nd2 f5 19.Bf4 Rd8 20.Be3 Rc8

+- (2.77 ++) Depth: 32/49 00:07:42 197MN

(, 12.01.2018)

>>33869

Chess engine analysis by the world's strongest free chess

>>33883

…world's strongest free chess engine

stupid browser haha

>>33878

Yep! Here's deeper analysis:

>>33859

Line

4rrk1/2p2ppp/p7/1p6/3P2P1/1BP4Q/PPKB1bP1/RN3q2 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 010118 64:

1.a4 bxa4 2.Rxa4 Rb8 3.Bc4 Rxb2+ 4.Kxb2 Rb8+ 5.Ka3 Qxb1 6.Rb4 Rxb4 7.cxb4 Bxd4 8.Qb3 Qa1+ 9.Qa2 Qxa2+ 10.Kxa2 c5 11.bxc5 Bxc5 12.Kb3 a5 13.Bxa5 Be3 14.Bd3 g6 15.Bc3 Bh6 16.Kc4 Bg7 17.Bd2 Ba1 18.Be3 Bb2 19.Be2 Kg7 20.Kd5 Bc3 21.Bf4 Bf6 22.Ke4 Bb2 23.Bd2 Kf8 24.Kd5 Kg7 25.Kc4 Bf6 26.Bf4 Kg8 27.Be3 Kg7 28.Bd2 Kf8 29.Kd5

+- (2.77) Depth: 40/57 00:19:58 738MN

(, 12.01.2018)

>>33946

Soros Jr. still at large

>>34000

Digits of truth

I wish I still had my old computer running; it had an up to date database, and the one I'm using is woefully out of date with the database; else I'd be able to tell what this game might be, as Chessbase Livebook gives it almost 3000 visits. This position has been played for sure

>>34030

wh000tttt!!!

\o/

>>33665

With black to move, Stockfish still gives a winning advantage to White:

Analysis by Stockfish 010118 64:

1…c5 2.dxc5 Bxc5 3.Bd5 Re2 4.Qd3 Qe1 5.a4 b4 6.Bf3 Rf2 7.Kb3 Qe5 8.Qe4 Qxe4 9.Bxe4 Rb8 10.Kc4 bxc3 11.Bxc3 Be7 12.Nd2 Rd8 13.Nf3 Rc8+ 14.Kd5 Rxg2 15.Ne5 Re2 16.Re1 Rd8+ 17.Kc4 Rxe1 18.Bxe1 Bf6 19.Bc3

+/- (1.41 –) Depth: 31/50 00:04:38 178MN

(, 12.01.2018)

>>34197

Deeper look:

Analysis by Stockfish 010118 64:

1…c5 2.dxc5 Bxc5 3.Bd5 Re2 4.Qd3 Qe1 5.b4 Be7 6.Bf3 Rf2 7.Kb3 Qe6+ 8.Qd5 Qxd5+ 9.Bxd5 Rd8 10.Bb7 Rf1 11.Bxa6 Rxd2 12.Bxb5 Re1 13.Nxd2 Rxa1 14.a4 Bg5 15.Nf3 Bc1 16.a5 Kf8 17.c4 Ke7 18.c5 Kd8 19.Bc4 f6 20.Bg8 Kc7 21.Bxh7 Be3 22.Be4 Rc1 23.Bd5 Kb8 24.Ka4 Ra1+ 25.Kb5 Kc7 26.a6

+/- (1.43) Depth: 31/54 00:05:24 204MN

(, 12.01.2018)

>>34230

This is with Black to move; others have posted that it shows whichever side to move wins the game, and this analysis says that no, even with Black to move White still has a good game

>>34321

I just hadn't heard of that variant before, until tonight kek