>>3364877

Bring the Ad Hominems.

Firstly I was right.

Let me explain why.

This is how it works.

1. i said a factum in ur argument. although I suggested from where it came I was not wrong in doing so by the response I got.

2. The ego in you noticed I shaked the reality u have of urself that is the "I am part of the stronger gender" and decided to bring this: Put me in a box where you have more "control" by saying I com from Reddit wich I most certainly do not. So there you fail.

3. Spacing looser = Ad Hominem. Suggest you had nothing at all to come with to break my argument and hence brought the lesser of all ways to come forth with an answer to show the massive intelligence you have accumulated in thy lifetime.

4. Think this is actually gtting to me and thus "feeling better".

Please.. mere human words cannot touch me if you cannot come with an answer that satisfy the intellect of a individual.

I can do not spacing so its easier for you to read.

Anyway, I look forward to having a chat with you again.

Anakin.. you lost the high ground before you even had the first thought touching the keyboard.

Cant touch a Diamond.

>>3365034

It all depend on by what standard you measure men to be stronger in.

Muscles?

i can agree.

Intellect?

No.

if you mean otherwise please state a fact to support that.

Statistics are not facts.

Also, the male gender is less evolded than the female by a empathy standpoint.

And dont bring th Kids argument in that one because it dont stand on its own.

Male gender is NOT superior by any standard other than the EGO finding ways to think its higher than anything else.

Deducting social and eviromental inputs since birth it cannot be stated.