>>3365850

No, it doesn't. In fact, that same day (or at least, reported that day) there was a SA arms deal that was exactly 53-47 vote. Also, there's no way even Q would know what individuals discussed behind closed doors in the intervening time since those numbers were posted.

Who knows. All that matters is what happens at 15:45.

>>3365867

Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up closer to (if not over) 60 seats once everything rolls. Lots of seats are toss-ups right now, and 2/3 of the seats up are currently held by Ds.

>>3365907

>so was mnuchin's confirmation vote, you could find countless votes like that

Yeah, that was kinda my point. Kek!