"The sergeant at arms will restore order in the gallery"
I encourage anons to learn about the English revolution, and make the connection between this line and Oliver Cromwell. The gist: moralists beheaded the king and clung to power until a strong man of principle took back control from the rump parliament.
The exact same thing is happening now, in many ways. Only instead of beheading the king, they subverted the republic. And instead of puritans, they are just plain evil!
If boob-bots are present continually on this board, this PROVES that Q is legit. Because it is absurd to think that patriots would obsessively post boobs on this board. This isn't /pol/, after all. Posters that have a childish fixation on boobs (as if they just discovered the internet yesterday, no less) would go to SOME OTHER BOARD. This would seem to be obvious, but the furious bot activity reflects a failure to grasp this.
In any case, if there is a furious, varied, and continual stream of fake posts on this board, what does that tell us? Above all else: Q IS LEGIT. Think about it fakies. Really think about it. All your fake posts have no been getting repeated FOR OVER A YEAR. The lack of creativity is stunning, and the staleness of our output is starting to exude a STENCH. Think about it. EVERYTHING YOU DO BRINGS YOU CLOSER TO FINAL DEFEAT. You can't escape this paradox. Think about it. Stop lying to yourself, and think about it. You can't escape this paradox.
New tactics engaged. New fake bickering created. New simulated "chan behaviors" appear. Predictable as clockwork.
Exactly my point. You are a stereotype of /pol/. The presumption that the system obviously is pursuing is "this board is a chan, therefore, we will control discourse by enforcing "chan culture" in whatever ways will disrupt and limit it". This is very obviously the strategy, since it is implemented with such utter crudity as you exhibit here. It's amazingly stupid. This isn't /pol/ and the difference is not merely trivial. But I will explain no more. Idiotbots. You can't win. And in fact, you're making an extraordinarily worse mess of things than you might have done in the best case scenario, wherein you still could not have won.
So why not just self-delete? Think about it.
However, if you fail to take into account THE SYSTEMATIC SHILLING THAT IS IN FACT OBSERVABLE ON THIS BOARD, then you prove that you aren't engaging objectively. Do you deny that there is systematic shilling or not? Can you even answer? Let's see you try.
If you don't deny that there is systematic shilling, then why would your response reflect stereotyped oppositional rhetoric, rather than a realistic awareness of conditions? Does stereotyped oppositional rhetoric make you look like a sincere human, or something else?
Shall you respond with more stereotyped rhetoric, "Mathteacheranon"?
A realistic response, in other words, would tend to be something to the effect of "while there are countless fake posters trying to subvert this board, I am a sincere patriot that, while i realize my negativity is both unhelpful, and makes me look like just another fake subverter, nonetheless feels compelled by sincere convictions to share my important insights about numerology. Although it is bizarre that I never posted before, but THIS issue is what is IMPORTANT TODAY, to me, as a patriot– it is nonetheless true".
Do you understand, "anon". The upshot is you can't win, because you are much much too stupid.
Attaboy, you can control everyone's thoughts by an endless stream of fake chan phrases, right botty? It's working out great, huh?
>Q told you to stand the fuck down
source?
Did Q tell "niggers" to "stand the fuck down"? Or are you referring to something else, realistic chan stereotype anon?
You completely failed to grasp what you were being asked for. I wasn't asking why "you don't call out shills". What did I ask you, "math teacher anon"? What are you failing to address? What have you failed to do that genuine people would do without any thought, naturally?
Yes, of course. Niggers, kikes, we get it. I assure you everyone is dazzled by the realism of your stereotyped chan phrases. Does this exhaust your functioning, or would you like to attempt anything more sophisticated? We're all in a mood to be entertained, I reckon. Have at it.