Anonymous ID: 50b17a Oct. 6, 2018, 6:50 p.m. No.3374183   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4407 >>4432

>>3374154

I see a strategic goal in allowing Kavanaugh to e attacked. Kavanaugh was attacked in a similar way to the way POTUS has been attacked since the '16 election. The Kavanaugh debacle enables POTUS to point out how he has endured much more than Kavanaugh has endured at the hands of the Dems.

 

This is brilliant. Bravo, Q!

Anonymous ID: 50b17a Oct. 6, 2018, 7:24 p.m. No.3374696   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4852

>>3374612

>But your welcome to disbelieve if you wish. It will come out some day and you will be able to say you heard it here first.

So you're guessing. That's fine.

 

Don't get me wrong - I don't know. But you stated what you stated as if you know. If you don't, that's fine. But I've been here since Nov. '17 and spent somewhere around 2500 hours researching so far. I have not seen any evidence to pin your claims down as fact or even put a likely spin on it.

 

Sure, it is possible, but if we know, we know. If we don't, we don't. Let's not overstate our theories.

Anonymous ID: 50b17a Oct. 6, 2018, 7:29 p.m. No.3374778   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3374695

Is there any consensus about the 13th amendment being covertly replaced? I saw flurries of posts about this between Dec. '17 and maybe Mar. '18 in cbts and here.

 

This image appears to imply the commonly known 13th amendment is 'as is' as opposed to covertly replaced.

Anonymous ID: 50b17a Oct. 6, 2018, 7:37 p.m. No.3374897   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3374852

Ok, I see where you're coming from. My first reaction was to the way you stated it - you appeared to be stating it as a fact. It doesn't sound like there's enough to prove it, but it is certainly a plausible theory.

 

The way I understand the current law, it is possible, but IMO, not probable. Butโ€ฆI don't know. The line would move depending on how the population would react to such an overt assertion of the use of NSA+MIL assets and propaganda in order to achieve the goal of draining the swamp.

 

Interesting. I'm not sure whether or not Q+MIL is manipulating the actors as much as you've asserted. It is possible. We shall see.