So on Q's 'their need for symbolism will be their downfall' — I believe that POTUS and others have hijacked a lot of that symbolism and use it liberally to confound them. Imagine thinking certain things have a particular meaning, and then having those same symbols used in your face by someone in a way which makes no sense.

I also believe that it has been known for a long time that they use headlines, pictures, etc. (on a daily basis) to communicate. Q et. al. know their comms - it would be good for this board to dig and learn those comms. There has been a sad dearth of digging here of late

>>3379771

POTUS never says things by accident. There definitely was a message delivered by that statement. It will be interesting to watch that unfold

Go find the many, many pics of POTUS using the triangle hand signal - he always has it with the 'capstone' pointing DOWN. But he uses other things as well. He is definitely using hand signs, plenty. Wonder what he is signalling

>>3379820

YES - but I think there is much more than just that

>>3379828

Exactly. That all needs to be dug and discussed — Q has said multiple times 'learn our comms' - I don't think he only meant the comms used on this board. There is an entire battle being waged while we watch, and it isn't all obvious

>>3379840

See? I KNEW this board was full of anons who know - it's time to get back to using that knowledge. We have much to gain, all of us, by sharing, learning, and spreading this stuff

>>3379859

Well, I believe that reference was pretty specific. But if you don't think symbolism is being used by not only the Pres, but his cabinet members (Pompeo's Coke bottle, the water bottles by Pence and Trump)…then maybe you're being selective, no?

>>3379885

Of course not. That's the point of each sharing what he knows – put it all together, and you have more than you knew before.

>>3379906

I just miss when this board was exploding with research and the discussion thereof – it was good, and it helped a lot of anons, this one included

>>3379909

we all interpret things differently, and a lot depends on the context and timing of the respective crumbs. I am not here to argue with you; disagree if you choose, it doesn't matter to me. I am one person - you are only one person.

Direct comms refers to what takes place with direct comms - that happens only here.

But they are communicating things to 'the enemy' as well, while we watch. It was that to which I was referring. You have misinterpreted my intention.

>>3379985

Could be, but very doubtful. I also am not only referring to while listening or debating (although in higher-level public speaking classes, gestures are taught). But there are pictures on magazine covers, object placement in those pictures, poses, etc.

>>3379993

Nothing in the past few days, but plenty on Blasey-Ford when that was relevant. And I looked around when the word 'cement' was popping up all over the place. Trying to settle on what to dig, with relation to China, which seems to be a hot topic at the moment. Will take direction when the coming week begins to unfold. The Kavanaugh show needs to wind down a bit for the next thing to pop up.

>>3380154

…or the Pergram?

>>3380189

THey're still not getting it. 'Disciples' or 'bakers' - kek

>>3380248

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1320316/Monica-McCarrick-butchered-twins-samurai-sword-slashing-throat.html

In horrific details about the double murder and attempted suicide, investigators say Monica McCarrick killed the little girls and then propped their bodies against the front door of the apartment in a bid to prevent rescuers from getting in.

Those nasty McCarricks…

>>3380279

I agree with you - most days I post nothing unless it is some sort of info. that I found somewhere. Then I drop it here. If someone picks it up, great. If no, I assume I was off the mark and move on - or I will wait a while and post it again.

I haven't managed to enlighten anyone but my boomer parents - which was no small feat. I work at a place where even a whisper of this stuff would hijack my career, so I never mention it there