Anonymous ID: 05c686 Oct. 7, 2018, 8:05 a.m. No.3380462   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Trump's economy too good? Strange side effect of booming job economy - employees just don't show up and don't bother formally quitting. Tied to managers' practice of not acknowledging resume submissions? Job seekers should pay attention to this and learn what NOT to do.

 

https://apnews.com/a63ef4c4eea24830a57798a63d4df9c8/Here-today,-ghosting-tomorrow-_-workers-just-disappear

 

Here today, ghosting tomorrow _ workers just disappear

By Joyce M. Rosenberg

Oct. 03, 2018

 

NEW YORK (AP) — All seemed to be going well with Randolph Rice’s new receptionist. She asked for more responsibilities and got them, and said she was happy.

 

Then, two months into the job at Rice’s law office, she didn’t show up for work or call in sick. Rice tried to reach her, but got no response. He’d been ghosted: The receptionist ended the work relationship in much the same way many people end romantic associations, without a text, email, or call.

 

“Phones and the internet have created less of a bond between individuals,” says Rice, who practices in Baltimore. “Connections are so easy to cut off, so, why not do it for a job?”

 

While most people do give notice if they intend to leave, ghosting is becoming more common. Small business owners and human resources professionals say it happens with staffers of any age and tenure, but is more likely among younger employees whose dependence on texts and chats can make them less experienced with tough conversations. Many deal with uncomfortable situations by just cutting off communication.

 

HR pros recommend that rather than dismiss ghosting as the result of bad manners or awkwardness, owners improve communication and deal with any problems that made workers quit. Rice did some soul-searching to see if he had missed any clues. He discovered that the extra work his receptionist asked for was never completed. He also saw on social media that she had a new job as a server in a bar. He believes she was unhappy despite what she said, but he’s still mystified.

 

“Maybe she woke up one day and said, ‘I’m done,’” he says.

 

The ghosting cases follow a trend toward no-shows at job interviews that began when companies resumed hiring after the Great Recession. Jodi Chavez, president of the recruiting firm Randstad Professionals, says some candidates felt that hiring managers were cavalier during the recession, not responding to resume submissions, emails and calls. They’re now acting the same way. And that recession-era approach is still a factor, says Pete Davis, president of recruiter Impact Management Services.

 

“Employers still have the attitude, or are behaving like they do, that people should be lucky to have a paycheck,” Davis says. He suggests owners give younger staffers the work environment they seek — one that appreciates them, their work and their needs — or expect more to quit and more to ghost.

 

The low unemployment rate and big demand for help makes staffers feel more empowered to just leave, Chavez says.

 

“There’s an abundance of job openings. They have more choices,” she says.

 

Ghosting may also result from the disparity between the way bosses and staffers communicate, Chavez says. Owners or managers may prefer to talk while staffers are more comfortable with texting and online chats. She suggests owners help younger staffers see that learning to communicate face-to-face will help them build skills that they’ll need.

 

“They should have regular conversations with employees so they feel comfortable with the relationship and so they’re not as tempted to ghost,” she says.

 

Josh Rubin realized he needed to improve communication with his marketing firm’s staffers when an employee who worked for him for about a year didn’t show up one day, didn’t call and never came back. She didn’t even respond when he emailed to say he needed to send a final paycheck to her.

 

Rubin, owner of Post Modern Marketing in Sacramento, California, asked other staffers if they knew of any problems. And they did: A client had been abusive to the employee. Rubin realized she wanted to avoid confrontation and found it easier to leave without a word.

 

Since then, Rubin says he’s tried to be more approachable and encourages staffers to speak up when there’s a problem.

 

Bret Bonnet was ghosted on what would have been an employee’s first day of work, just hours after the would-be staffer texted him, “See you tomorrow, boss man!”

 

The man had already done all the paperwork for a $90,000 job at Quality Logo Products, a Chicago company that makes water bottles, pens and other promotional products. He’d even spent time on Skype to help the company set up a new laptop for him.

 

But on that day, there was no staffer and no answers to calls, texts or Facebook messages.

 

[More at website]

Anonymous ID: 05c686 Oct. 7, 2018, 8:27 a.m. No.3380654   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Worried about radiation dose while on an jet flight? See sauce for daily info on "hottest"/average/lowest dose flights. Good info when arranging a flight. Doesn't give precise measurements but instead compares it to natural radiation at sea level.

 

http://www.spaceweather.com/

 

Cosmic Rays in the Atmosphere

 

SOMETHING NEW! We have developed a new predictive model of aviation radiation. It's called E-RAD–short for Empirical RADiation model. We are constantly flying radiation sensors onboard airplanes over the US and and around the world, so far collecting more than 22,000 gps-tagged radiation measurements. Using this unique dataset, we can predict the dosage on any flight over the USA with an error no worse than 15%.

 

E-RAD lets us do something new: Every day we monitor approximately 1400 flights criss-crossing the 10 busiest routes in the continental USA. Typically, this includes more than 80,000 passengers per day. E-RAD calculates the radiation exposure for every single flight.

 

The Hot Flights Table is a daily summary of these calculations. It shows the 5 charter flights with the highest dose rates; the 5 commercial flights with the highest dose rates; 5 commercial flights with near-average dose rates; and the 5 commercial flights with the lowest dose rates. Passengers typically experience dose rates that are 20 to 70 times higher than natural radiation at sea level.

 

To measure radiation on airplanes, we use the same sensors we fly to the stratosphere onboard Earth to Sky Calculus cosmic ray balloons: neutron bubble chambers and X-ray/gamma-ray Geiger tubes sensitive to energies between 10 keV and 20 MeV. These energies span the range of medical X-ray machines and airport security scanners.

 

Column definitions: (1) The flight number; (2) The maximum dose rate during the flight, expressed in units of natural radiation at sea level; (3) The maximum altitude of the plane in feet above sea level; (4) Departure city; (5) Arrival city; (6) Duration of the flight.

Anonymous ID: 05c686 Oct. 7, 2018, 8:40 a.m. No.3380779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0923

>>3380457

 

Global warming report from IPCC riddled with errors - and governments are making decisions based on these "consensus facts"!

 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/10/07/bombshell-audit-of-global-warming-data-finds-it-riddled-with-errors/

 

BOMBSHELL: audit of global warming data finds it riddled with errors

 

Anthony Watts / 3 hours ago October 7, 2018

 

Just ahead of a new report from the IPCC, dubbed SR#15 about to be released today, we have this bombshell- a detailed audit shows the surface temperature data is unfit for purpose. The first ever audit of the world’s most important temperature data set (HadCRUT4) has found it to be so riddled with errors and “freakishly improbable data” that it is effectively useless.

 

From the IPCC:

 

“Global Warming of 1.5 °C, an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.

 

This is what consensus science brings you – groupthink with no quality control.

 

HadCRUT4 is the primary global temperature dataset used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to make its dramatic claims about “man-made global warming”. It’s also the dataset as the center of “ClimateGate” from 2009, managed by the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at East Anglia University.

 

The audit finds more than 70 areas of concern about data quality and accuracy.

 

But according to an analysis by Australian researcher John McLean it’s far too sloppy to be taken seriously even by climate scientists, let alone a body as influential as the IPCC or by the governments of the world.

 

Main points:

•The Hadley data is one of the most cited, most important databases for climate modeling, and thus for policies involving billions of dollars.

 

•McLean found freakishly improbable data, and systematic adjustment errors , large gaps where there is no data, location errors, Fahrenheit temperatures reported as Celsius, and spelling errors.

 

•Almost no quality control checks have been done: outliers that are obvious mistakes have not been corrected – one town in Columbia spent three months in 1978 at an average daily temperature of over 80 degrees C. One town in Romania stepped out from summer in 1953 straight into a month of Spring at minus 46°C. These are supposedly “average” temperatures for a full month at a time. St Kitts, a Caribbean island, was recorded at 0°C for a whole month, and twice!

 

•Temperatures for the entire Southern Hemisphere in 1850 and for the next three years are calculated from just one site in Indonesia and some random ships.

 

•Sea surface temperatures represent 70% of the Earth’s surface, but some measurements come from ships which are logged at locations 100km inland. Others are in harbors which are hardly representative of the open ocean.

 

•When a thermometer is relocated to a new site, the adjustment assumes that the old site was always built up and “heated” by concrete and buildings. In reality, the artificial warming probably crept in slowly. By correcting for buildings that likely didn’t exist in 1880, old records are artificially cooled. Adjustments for a few site changes can create a whole century of artificial warming trends.

 

Details of the worst outliers

 

•For April, June and July of 1978 Apto Uto (Colombia, ID:800890) had an average monthly temperature of 81.5°C, 83.4°C and 83.4°C respectively.

 

•The monthly mean temperature in September 1953 at Paltinis, Romania is reported as -46.4 °C (in other years the September average was about 11.5°C).

 

•At Golden Rock Airport, on the island of St Kitts in the Caribbean, mean monthly temperatures for December in 1981 and 1984 are reported as 0.0°C. But from 1971 to 1990 the average in all the other years was 26.0°C.

 

[More at website]