Anonymous ID: 8dc275 Oct. 7, 2018, 11:30 a.m. No.3382581   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Q. Bury these monsters.

 

After-Birth Abortion

The pro-choice case for infanticide

 

Health and Science has moved! You can find new stories here.

HUMAN NATURE

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND LIFE.

MARCH 12 2012 11:14 AM

After-Birth Abortion

The pro-choice case for infanticide.

By William Saletan

A Dutch baby born on Feb. 29, 2012

A Dutch baby born on Feb. 29, 2012

Photograph by Robin Utrecht/AFP/Getty Images.

 

Just when you thought the religious right couldn’t get any crazier, with its personhood amendments and its attacks on contraception, here comes the academic left with an even crazier idea: after-birth abortion.

 

No, I didn’t make this up. “Partial-birth abortion” is a term invented by pro-lifers. But “after-birth abortion” is a term invented by two philosophers, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva. In the Journal of Medical Ethics, they propose:

 

[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.

 

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2012/03/after_birth_abortion_the_pro_choice_case_for_infanticide_.html