Ive thought about this a lot recently.
People who cling to views that WE have seen evidence that proves them false. Are they stupid for not looking into the truth? Are they incapable of believing anything unless it comes from a "trusted source" (i.e. not the primary source)? I honestly think its just that they are lazy in their thoughts on politics. It takes a lot of mental effort to review evidence and make conclusions, and in this time of instant gratification, its way easier to just have someone tell you what is true, and blindly believe it.
I know that there are some here who view Q that way, and blindly follow everything he says.
The kavanaugh debacle is a great example of a bunch of people picking a side without reviewing information. Anyone who really looked into the statements made and facts presented (as well as the histories of all parties involved) would have known outright how much of a sham it all was, and yet people acted like everything under the sun was credible.
Is it possible for everyone to be dilligent in heir ideas? I try to be, and i dont find it that difficult, but then again thats just my perspective, only my way of navigating the world.
Is it possible to fundamentally change the way people review information and validate their opinions?