>>3385175
Can someone please explain to me how military tribunals could have been convened to have jurisdiction over cases involving American civilians (Deep State operatives)— in the absense of matrial law?
Something about this whole thing isn't adding up, but I'm inclined to believe that it might be true—given the way the 'departure' of NoName went down. Most DS operators are not publicly known. But its plausible that they were being removed all along behind the scenes. The RINOs, and D's in Congress and the fake media are logically the next step, but some of these peopled don'tseem the least bit concerned (Maxine, CS, et al). But the part that isn't making much sense is that they would remove NoName yet leave so many far worse DS operators at large (i.e. Soros, Hussein, Jarrrett, DWS, etc.). And so many of the biggest scandals (AWAN, CF, FISA…) just seem to dead-end and disappear with the IGs. All that fucking evidence against HRC and the CF in Weiner's briefcase…yet nothing!
Oh, for a clue. If all this has already gone down then why are most of the major players still walking around free flapping their gums. This is what makes me think it might be bullshit…unless they've all been given a specific amount of time—like NoName.