Anonymous ID: 291959 Oct. 8, 2018, 6:02 a.m. No.3392561   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2592 >>2721

>>3392441

That'd be true if the democratic mob actually stood for the virtue signaling they use to yank people in. The fact that she is a Republican woman means that she does not count in their eyes. They don't give a rats ass about her and consider her a traitor and turncoat. They are roasting Collins right now as we speak because of her vote, despite the fact that we've heard claims that she was viciously threatened. Picture how anons here feel about faggots who betray Trump and become RINOs. That's how the other side feels about any woman or minority pet that speaks out of line. I've seen it first hand, their fake "tolerance" is situational and temperamental. They don't actually fight for ANYONE but themselves. So they won't give a rat's ass about any message this sends. She's a good girl for going Dem, and that Republican woman is a 'nasty skank racist anti-semite!' Watch!

Anonymous ID: 291959 Oct. 8, 2018, 6:07 a.m. No.3392592   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3392562

This illustrates my point in >>3392561 as well as anything. Thanks dem assholes. This black judge was treaty like trash by a Dem senator. His appointment blocked because senator asshole didn't want the first black to be appointed by an R. Now this just speaks to the self serving cunts that make up their party. They're fucking slavers who use people.

Anonymous ID: 291959 Oct. 8, 2018, 6:11 a.m. No.3392623   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3392610

Nope. I am fully and potently opposed to any mainstream propaganda machines. I am fanatical about this and have been for a long time. I have the Three fucking Stooges on right now and I feel like that's more intelligent.

Anonymous ID: 291959 Oct. 8, 2018, 6:30 a.m. No.3392785   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3392721

>expressing a view different from the norm today, namely that as a woman, you must vote for a woman.

I'm just saying that that 'norm' is very conditional. Their only goal is to fool people into thinking that they espouse these goals. As I also said, read this post: >>3392562. It perfectly illustrates that a member of the Dem's priviledged group voters is only as good as the public image he can gain for them. Other than that he is nothing. She won't pay any price, because these assholes need all the publically visible support they can get!

 

I can see what you mean by the act of a woman voting based on her inner ideas and not based on some shallow gender bias, but she's still going for the party who only uses people for material gain. I'm not sure if you quite realize yet how fake these rats are. I think subscribing to their horseshit at this points overrides any value one could ascribe to playing against the rules of these very same peoples' false dichotomy division. She's still playing their game. Also, I'm going to start spreading the idea that no one should give a fuck what a celebrity has to say about anything. I ignore all articles regarding her.