Anonymous ID: d640d3 Oct. 8, 2018, 6:41 a.m. No.3392843   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3392721 (lb)

>>3392785 (lb)

Understand that the way I am responding to you is taking the extreme partisan position. I'm saying that by joining this party she has just given even more support to the agenda they play themselves (that being women only vote for women). And not only is this divisive and evil, they also don't really mean it! You are doing good by opposing their mental games. You are correct that people should not just vote for those that resemble them, but I still feel like you are giving undue attention to political ideas that lack any substance whatsoever. You are trying to find the good in a big stack of steaming shit. This Kavanaugh crap showed me that we can't even have a civilized debate about real issues, be they economic or even gender/race (as much as I loathe those in general) without the complete dissolution of this hideous party of slavedrivers. Nothing less will be satisfactory. This is how you shift the window. You make their party irrelevant, then the new fault line of the debate is located in more sane territory altogether. Let's cut these fucks out of the landscape entirely! And that means no more support for democrats. Anybody there left with a soul can and should abandon them nominally and actually to stand with people not trying to turn us into a communist shithole. Now is the time to act on them. Party politics suck ass and I'd much rather ignore it all, but right now all the assholes are nicely converging for us.

Anonymous ID: d640d3 Oct. 8, 2018, 6:48 a.m. No.3392907   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2927 >>3261

>>3392846

I fully embrace the concept of realpolitik as of now. We can debate theoretical and ethical questions once all the fucking assholes are gone. It's nice when you can have healthy discussions and solve problems for all kinds of different people, but they way things are now you can't make chicken salad with chicken shit. Let's clean up the shit first. And that's what I think realpolitik could be used for here. I don't care to debate people who scream and claw at the doors of our highest court like retards. Now I just want to convince other fence sitters that we should be shooting these psychos.

Anonymous ID: d640d3 Oct. 8, 2018, 6:58 a.m. No.3392993   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3043

>>3392951

There's probably no motivation to speak of. She's an impressionable woman hanging around Hollywood Marxist shitheads so she is going to support these people. Once we eliminate them then they won't be around to brainwash girls like this. It's as simple as that. Death to the Marxists, but that is all. I feel like I've already typed out too much about a person I give not one half a fuck about. But remember there's a good, very true quote about this.

 

"The world isn't dying. It's being killed. And the people killing it have names and addresses."

Anonymous ID: d640d3 Oct. 8, 2018, 7:05 a.m. No.3393037   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3163 >>3230

>>3392997

They are old and failing now too. A dusty dry shell of an 'establishment.' Even academia is reeling from a huge reproducibility crisis and controversies surrounding blatantly false data reporting. This is what happens when you cram ideologies that don't work in the real world down everyone's throats for half a century. Giving women and minorities special treatment based entirely on who they are and their pasts is not only wrong and discriminatory, but it will invariably lead to complete failure and stagnation. Enough is right.