>>339539

Landed @ St. Pete… don't see it taking off again tho.

>>339573

Notice that the underground construction is quite a ways away from the water treatment tanks… if it were water storage you would think it would be closer… plus a TON of solar power for a water treatment plant.

>>339688

Couldn't have been more than 45min - 1hr

>>339713

We are looking for a datacenter not a bunker… and the US typically has used Diesel generators in their bunkers… can't think of a documented instance where it used nuclear except at Thule greenland.

>>339563

The last time that "The Hunt for Red October" was used was Nov 20th… and the first use without "The Hunt for" was Dec 19th according to qcode unless im missing something what is the significance?

>>339816

WTF are you talking about?? A datacenter isn't necessarily a bunker, where did you get that idea?? Q said Underground Massive Datacenter, we may have found it, and you are going off on tangents about nuclear reactors in bunkers and WW3…meanwhile if WW3 happens you are NOT going to be worried about keeping a datacenter running. The Solar Panels are to save money when running the datacenter normally. I agree that nuclear would be nice to have in a bunker situation, but like I said there are NO instances of US bunkers having nuclear reactors… NORAD, Mt. Weather, Site-R, Iron Mountain ALL have Diesel generators. So thank you for distracting.

>>339871

No totally agree it is almost the ideal size for use by a datacenter thats why I find this location in Henderson so interesting.

2-AUER landing in Naples after a random <30min-1hr stop in St. Pete, FL.

>>340024

I mean it's either that place or there is more to this Zayo Datacenter underground near McCarran Arpt that is not obvious from above. Too small, not enough heat exchangers.. etc.

>>340098

Don't see any..