>>3395126

Exactly. The predictions keep you on the hook. The WAY they come, the TIMING and the HOW of it is NOT a military counter coup, not any of that. It's exactly cult playbook. Like JW (which was originally a money scheme by CTR, then taken over by an even bigger carnival runner). The techniques are playbook. When you see that, the Q illusion falls away.

I'm crushed about this, btw. For a time I believed, then saw what Q was missing, then figured out how to do a few of Q's magic tricks, then got wind of the "team"

It's over for them. "Time to push the Q"? YOU BET.

I just don't want our side, Trump people, to look like clowns over this. It would be devastating.

>>3395168

I'm not shilling. I'm not waiting for dough anymore. I've baked enough.

>>3395213

I never wanted "predictions".

I contributed real work here for quite a while, ok?

Be careful about name calling people you don't even know. I don't wish any of us ill.

Everything good that has happened since 2016 was done by Trump and his team. There has been a LOT of good. But what does any of it have to do with "Q"? It was Trump. REMEMBER THAT.

It's exciting to get wrapped up in it. I wanted to believe. I was so wrapped up and helped spread the word. It took a while to realize this was an act of faith that I had taken. Unconnected with ANYTHING. The WAY it's done, and the TYPE of hints/content, do not align with the reality we want. I figured out a few "tricks". The first was hidden, then the second came easy. I can't wait for the next tripcode. I was let down. Now I'm just pissed.

The reveal is going to be pretty big news.

>>3395331

Exactly. "Logical thinking."

Q doesn't know (or chooses not to reveal) some of the root causes, events, and people. cicada 3301 hacker type level understanding of theology and philosophy - mistakes made in drops made me see it. I'm so angry today.

>>3395383

No! Of COURSE not.

Trump and a LOT of people in the government.

Look at all the support Trump has. We've given him money just like hundreds of thousands of people. SO MANY PEOPLE support him. But there's a whole team, there's a LOT of people and they're working for good. Sometimes one step back, but then two steps forward.

What I am saying is that we have not been given one shred of evidence that Q is what Q presents itself to be, and Trump nor anyone in his team or working for him has EVER openly acknowledged Q. And, finally, there are some big holes I'm seeing in the Q trick. I wish us all well. That's all I'm saying.

>>3395406

>>>3395307

>your picture is very small

>you should try looking at the bigger one

>your thinking is constricted

>you should try expanding it

I would say "lol" but this is dangerous because what you're saying is the exact mindset that keeps people taking the bait.

>>3395398

Do you see how bad you are behaving?

Extremely uncharitable. Emotionally and SPIRITUALLY immature. Donate some cash to preying medic or another 401(3) "ministry"? Or buy a t-shirt maybe?

You are openly name calling, insulting an anon's intelligence quotient, because he is asking people to think.

You really think it's not possible for a few smart techs to do [0:00]?

BTW, I was a part of this "research group of volunteer patriots" for over a year. And I never called anyone here names.

>>3395478

What concrete transparency has Q provided?

Who in the govt recognizes Q?