Anonymous ID: ca4c29 Oct. 8, 2018, 10:33 a.m. No.3395213   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5307

>>3395158

 

>I'm too stupid to properly absorb and understand the information that Q has given us and instead put it in terms of "predictions I can use on people in my life to inflate my ego when I'm proved right"

Anonymous ID: ca4c29 Oct. 8, 2018, 10:49 a.m. No.3395398   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5518

>>3395307

 

You have all the markings of a concernfag shill, who frantically and emotionally makes an illogical case for doubt

or

You're just a middling IQ normie who though he could be an anon, spun himself out, and is now spouting bullshit from his half-broken brain.

 

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume you're stupid.

Anonymous ID: ca4c29 Oct. 8, 2018, 11:07 a.m. No.3395675   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5683

>>3395518

 

[0:00] style proofs are among the weakest and most inconsequential confirmations that we have received.

Their sole function is to function as a wink and a nod to boost morale, it is irrelevant how easy it would be to fake this.

The fact that you LEAD with that example betrays the embarrassing fact that you think they are relevant in any way to fidelity of the information Q has provided us.

 

If you spent a year here and this is the best you can do, you REALLY should consider spending the next one on voat.