>>>3395518
>[0:00] style proofs are among the weakest and most inconsequential confirmations that we have received.
Great! THANK YOU for pointing this out!
Maybe they should be completely struck from "Q Proofs" then!
And then would you suggest to the various ministries and donation-asking organizations to stop FEATURING them on their YouTube videos? Because they LEAD with them, as you surely know.
>Their sole function is to function as a wink and a nod to boost morale, it is irrelevant how easy it would be to fake this.
Relatively easy to accomplish non-proof is a "wink and a nod"?
A hack that we have figured out (in other words a MAGIC TRICK) will boost "morale"?
Only to those who don't know the trick.
Kind of like the tripcodes in Google Books.
It's NOT irrelevant. This is featured stuff. If it's so irrelevant, why would Q waste the time?
Do generals waste time?
>The fact that you LEAD with that example betrays the embarrassing fact that you think they are relevant in any way to fidelity of the information Q has provided us.
I didn't LEAD with this. I've been talking about things for weeks.
>If you spent a year here and this is the best you can do, you REALLY should consider spending the next one on voat.
You mean, the place where Q told "patriots" to go?
Isn't https://voat.co/v/QRV the "official" board ENDORSED by Q?
Oh yes it is. Even if it was removed from Qmap.pub.
BTW, your tone sucks. I'm not attacking any anons. Why so belligerent and hostile?