Trump uses contrast between good and evil to motivate people. He makes people feel uncomfortable with the status quo to motivate them, then gives them a path of least resistance for a win. Good triumphs over evil. That’s what counter punching is all about. Nothing complicated here.
Question:
I checked the definition of “affiant” which RR states he was not in regard to the FISA. I know there has been some discussion about the FISA process within the FBI and DOJ, but I don’t recall reading anything that lets RR off the hook, other than his statement that he was not the affiant.
affiant – a person who signs an affidavit and swears to its truth before a notary public or some person authorized to take oaths.
So just what does his signature mean on the request for reauthorization of the FISA Warrant?
It has to attest to or confirm something he would have been accountable for, otherwise what would be the point?
Could RR be the person “authorized to take oaths” in this regard?