Anonymous ID: fe9962 Oct. 8, 2018, 8:45 p.m. No.3403774   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3818 >>3822

Know some SF guys that swore to authenticity of all of this shit. NOT just the middle east either.

 

After fighting the longest war in its history, the US stands at the brink of defeat in Afghanistan. How could this be possible? How could the world’s sole superpower have battled continuously for more than 16 years – deploying more than 100,000 troops at the conflict’s peak, sacrificing the lives of nearly 2,300 soldiers, spending more than $1tn (£740bn) on its military operations, lavishing a record $100bn more on “nation-building”, helping fund and train an army of 350,000 Afghan allies – and still not be able to pacify one of the world’s most impoverished nations? So dismal is the prospect of stability in Afghanistan that, in 2016, the Obama White House cancelled a planned withdrawal of its forces, ordering more than 8,000 troops to remain in the country indefinitely.

 

It was during the cold war that the US first intervened in Afghanistan, backing Muslim militants who were fighting to expel the Soviet Red Army. In December 1979, the Soviets occupied Kabul in order to shore up their failing client regime; Washington, still wounded by the fall of Saigon four years earlier, decided to give Moscow its “own Vietnam” by backing the Islamic resistance. For the next 10 years, the CIA would provide the mujahideen guerrillas with an estimated $3bn in arms. These funds, along with an expanding opium harvest, would sustain the Afghan resistance for the decade it would take to force a Soviet withdrawal. One reason the US strategy succeeded was that the surrogate war launched by the CIA did not disrupt the way its Afghan allies used the country’s swelling drug traffic to sustain their decade-long struggle.

 

Despite almost continuous combat since the invasion of October 2001, pacification efforts have failed to curtail the Taliban insurgency, largely because the US simply could not control the swelling surplus from the country’s heroin trade. Its opium production surged from around 180 tonnes in 2001 to more than 3,000 tonnes a year after the invasion, and to more than 8,000 by 2007. Every spring, the opium harvest fills the Taliban’s coffers once again, funding wages for a new crop of guerrilla fighters.

 

At each stage in its tragic, tumultuous history over the past 40 years – the covert war of the 1980s, the civil war of the 90s and its post-2001 occupation – opium has played a central role in shaping the country’s destiny. In one of history’s bitter ironies, Afghanistan’s unique ecology converged with American military technology to transform this remote, landlocked nation into the world’s first true narco-state – a country where illicit drugs dominate the economy, define political choices and determine the fate of foreign interventions.

 

Over the longer term, the US intervention produced a black hole of geopolitical instability that would never again be sealed or healed. Afghanistan could not readily recover from the unprecedented devastation it suffered in the years of the first American intervention. As the Soviet-Afghan war wound down between 1989 and 1992, the Washington-led alliance essentially abandoned the country, failing either to sponsor a peace settlement or finance reconstruction.

 

After largely ignoring Afghanistan for a decade, Washington “rediscovered” the country in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In October 2001, the US began bombing the country, and then, with the support of British forces, launched an invasion spearheaded by local warlords. The Taliban regime collapsed with a speed that surprised many government officials. In retrospect, it seems likely that its opium prohibition was a crucial factor.

 

While the American bombing campaign raged throughout October 2001, the CIA shipped $70m in cash into the country to mobilise its old cold war coalition of tribal warlords for the fight against the Taliban, an expenditure President George W Bush would later hail as one of history’s biggest “bargains”. To capture Kabul and other key cities, the CIA put its money behind the leaders of the Northern Alliance, an ethnic Tajik force that had fought the Soviets in the 1980s and then resisted the Taliban government in the 1990s. They, in turn, had long dominated the drug traffic in the area of north-east Afghanistan that they controlled during the Taliban years. The CIA also turned to a group of rising Pashtun warlords along the Pakistan border who had been active as drug smugglers in the south-eastern part of the country. As a result, when the Taliban collapsed, the groundwork had already been laid for the resumption of opium cultivation and the drug trade on a major scale.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/jan/09/how-the-heroin-trade-explains-the-us-uk-failure-in-afghanistan

Anonymous ID: fe9962 Oct. 8, 2018, 8:52 p.m. No.3403873   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3886 >>3897

>>3403818

amen. sad to here anon. respect fren. they really really really fuck us good at every chance they get. as if the Our Greatest Hero's didn't have to worry enough about pungee sticks or getting btfo or shot at they were gettin shot up with with that shit.

been there myself. dark dark dark places. blur really.

that awful shit is one incredibly powerful as fuck evil ass drug.

Anonymous ID: fe9962 Oct. 8, 2018, 8:53 p.m. No.3403886   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3403873

the needle that is, not nam.

 

given me flashbacks of hell on earth nonetheless though. shitbox houses, floors aint been cleaned in 15 years… ugh.

Anonymous ID: fe9962 Oct. 8, 2018, 9:02 p.m. No.3404031   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4098

>>3403897

i shit you not, and i feel weak as fuck to even admit it, but i was in a dark as hell, darker than hell time in my life, not a drug under the sun i hadn't fucked with unless it just had no "appeal" to me… whether or not i did is irrelevent; but i litterally thought it would be a "rush" and "cool" idea to try to cook crystal after watching Breaking Bad. We would all have parties and watch the new episode every week…

not without its undue irony less than a year later a task force seargent in the jail talking about how breaking bad shouldnt even be on tv, peered in my cell and said "ya, because there's some wholesome family programming… (head shake)"

 

get away from the drugs find out its the organic chemistry that had all the allure.

cocksuckers..

 

that being said though i almost feel DMT can almost counter all that bad shit.

DMT is some next level au naturel shit.

 

also seen it make a kid think he was dieing to the point i was actually afraid he was. so maybe not.. kek

Anonymous ID: fe9962 Oct. 8, 2018, 9:13 p.m. No.3404188   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4205 >>4259

>>3404040

House Intel Committee tees up release of Russia probe transcripts

09/27/2018

 

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

The House Intelligence Committee will vote Friday to publicly release dozens of transcripts of interviews conducted in its now defunct Russia investigation — including testimony of prominent figures in President Donald Trump’s orbit.

 

The transcripts, from interviews primarily conducted between June 2017 and March 2018, include testimony from Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, Hope Hicks, Roger Stone and other longtime Trump allies and associates, as well as his current campaign manager, Brad Parscale and former campaign leaders Corey Lewandowski and Steve Bannon. Trump’s longtime bodyguard Keith Schiller interviewed as well.

 

The list also includes prominent intelligence community figures and Justice Department officials from the Obama administration, like Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates and James Clapper. Interview transcripts from Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, Dan Coats, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions would be released as well.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/27/transcripts-russia-house-846231

 

 

GOP invites Comey, Lynch and Yates to testify on FBI bias claims.

09/25/2018

 

House Republicans are preparing to call their highest-profile witnesses yet in a yearlong investigation into the FBI and the Justice Department’s actions in 2016 and 2017 — including former FBI Director James Comey, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates.

 

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy issued requests for interviews with the three high-profile former officials in letters sent Friday and Monday, committee sources confirmed. The letters ask each prospective witness to arrange a time to testify as quickly as possible.

 

Other witnesses who received requests include Glenn Simpson, co-founder of Fusion GPS; former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos; former Justice Department deputy counterintelligence chief Richard Scott; and former FBI official Bill Sweeney.

 

The large slate of requests suggests the panels leading the probe are entering the most crucial phase of their work and may still have weeks to go before interviews are complete. That leaves a narrow window for lawmakers to issue findings ahead of the 2018 congressional elections and could push their work into the lame-duck session of Congress. It likely ensures a revolving door of witness interviews during the sensitive final weeks of the campaign.

 

Comey, Yates and Lynch all had roles in signing off on applications to surveil the communications of former Trump campaign aide Carter Page in late 2016 and early 2017. Papadopoulos, who is slated to serve a two-week jail sentence for lying to the FBI about his contacts with a Russia-linked professor, has indicated willingness to testify to lawmakers about his role in the campaign.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/25/gop-comey-lynch-yates-fbi-bias-probe-842409

Anonymous ID: fe9962 Oct. 8, 2018, 9:22 p.m. No.3404305   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3404261

I don't doubt that for a second anon. that whole stretch going up to the canadian border is more crooked cops than good. last time i was there anyway.

if anything i'd bet it'd be worse. the only thing PNW cops are good at is threats, framing or attempts (theyre all to fucking stupid to pull it off clean) or looking the other way on the only shit they shouldnt be.