OK, we're over the target thinking a couple of Rosatom guys were the reason for downing the aircraft.

We're the good guys, have no jurisdiction, and wouldn't have wanted them dead. Dean men don't testify.

So someone WITH jurisdiction/operability takes a really high profile approach in eliminating them. This sends a signal to others involved.

Why remove them so they can't testify? It would only help to protect the Clinton's/Obama's. Or would it?????

We know the Russians are totally ruthless and perfectly capable of acts like this. What could possibly be so important to the Russians?

Was Russian involvement/collusion in our election/politics MUCH deeper than has been revealed?

What ELSE do the Russians have to hide? If U1/Hillary/Obama collusion was one thing, is there yet another shoe to drop?

We seem to have a bit of a handle on the former, I'm starting to become concerned that we're being warmed up/prepped to accept the latter.

>>341077

> Verify it.

Not mine, just grabbed from last thread for context. If pic is wrong, my bad.

>>341104

>Wrong guy,

>>341108

>>341227

>the cabal isn't "the Russians". The cabal isn't "the Americans" either. "The cabal" is the cabal.

Point taken, you are correct. Thanks for looking past the f…ing picture and reading.

To your point, I know this and totally agree but don't feel the cabal has as much freedom in Russia as it does everywhere else.

Putin has been ruthless in removing them, so my surmise is that the Russians themselves took this action.

There are many moving parts in play here and this action could very well have been to protect Russian interests, not the cabal's.

>>341540

> Putin is fighting the cabal for years and years now. Trump has just started

After kicking out the central bankers and restoring his countries fiscal health, coupled with a mature and robust intelligence apparatus, I don't think the cabal has the running room in Russia that it has elsewhere. Of course the cabal, which is closely aligned with the left in the U.S. could have paid someone to take the plane down, though at considerable risk of coming to a very bad end in something like the Lubyanka.

So back to my initial query, what else could the Russians need to address by removing these Rosatom/U1 actors?

Possibly something other than or worse than their collusion with the DNC? Perhaps an even deeper intrusion into the body politic/financial/nuclear/military?