any video depicting sex with children or murder/ torture of children will never surface on the net. It is illegal to post, watch, or share. The most anyone can hope for as far as that truth coming out is a jury trial showing it being discussed.
>>3411515 you make the assumption that half the planet would commit the crime. Only a moron would post or share it because they would absolutely be jailed
>>3411860 they will decide on U S citizens being allowed to be tried as enemy combatants in a military Court. If they decide it is constitutional, nothing more
>>3411860 you might find this helpful to save and refer back to when you have questions about military tribunals. The authorization of military force was granted on 9/18/01. This Duke paper gives you an idea of the legal arguments that will come to the SC once arrests happen. Also listen to HRC in UK this morning. She is screaming about events from 18 years ago and telling why they musty win back house or senate
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1294&context=djcil
POTUS is using "Get's it" often. I think it's a way to say TRUST ( ) without meaning they have been read into the plan. More like /ourguy? /ourgal/