OK, I have to bring this up. Two times Q has indicated two days ahead of time he knew someone was going to die that for all intents and purposes were good guys. I knowyou cannot stop good people from dying, but… why? Same with BDT. Sure, it was unsuccessful, but he apparently knew.

They ask why they keep coming to tell us. It isn't like we can race through and get these people to safety and someone else obviously isn't.

This part bothers me. It implies acceptable collateral damage, or inability to help.

Now someone like the old bat Ginsberg… she's led a good life and can go. I'd prefer it to be truly natural, but the only hings we cannot escape completely is death and taxes, so… sooner she goes, the better the SCOTUS could be.

He provides validity, but it is at the cost of lives. that is not so cool, so I think we - or- someone else is not getting the job done.

>>341855

TV interview I think. Otherwise you never see him and he never selfies. Same with JA these days. I like to think his is out of an agreement to not rock the boat to bad. Last night him answering questions was the most feedback and interactions "he" has had with the public in a long time. A lot rides on Tuesday. That and the freaking US needs to state clearly they are not coming after him. They have not yet. And any "Free Julian" campaigns seem to fall on blind eyeballs. It may be the will of the people to not see him charged, but we do not work by mob and majority rule. I still believe his constitutional 1A rights (they apply to EVERYONE) are being trampled on.

>>341854

Never been to reddit. What's it like? Fuck off fag. LOL. If you don't ask questions you don't get answers. But you know that. If you haven't asked for sauce on the dodgy RGB post I'd have flamed you, but I won't. I posed the collateral damage vs movies concept that the good guy always wins. We do not. I know that.

>>341910

That's my take. When our own Intel agencies are at war with each other, you just throw up your hands and go …

>>341927

Then check the people to the top and below that one harder? Sort of like warm, warmer… We need to stay open to it.

>>341902

I think you got a couple of them backwards. IE if she hated the Paki govty, and they are bad (and connected to Awans) then she is not a clown…

>>342384

Out with a rope behind a boat, on fire maybe…

>>342402

Check the file name on the graphic. LOL At GA I mean…

>>342430

it's verified. So go figure. They let that shit be verified and not JA. That always spoke volumes to me.

>>342476

This was discussed earlier today… LOL

>>342501

So what did the OLD HAG say? That is a question.

>>342525

Drop the name, fag. Or your comp is at risk.