> What if Snowden was still a Clown?
"was still" implies that some major change took place. You might say it when someone passed–"He was still drinking when he fell off his horse." Or you might say it when someone died: "She was still working on her memoirs when she passed."
It's an interesting thing to point out. Something happened to Snowden for sure.
I'm embarrassed to admit that I was one of those that supported him. But since late October, my worldview has changed quite a bit, ha ha…
When he mentioned "Ruth Bader Ginsburg," my first thought was that she was the next target on the cabal's list. In other words, she's going to be "heart attacked."
But think about it logically–what good what that do them? She's a staunch Liberal, and both the House and Senate are controlled by Republicans. All that would do is give Trump the opportunity to put another Conservative in. Of course, they might try to do set something up for after the next election…but the polls show that Democrat support has slipped precipitously, from 15% over Republicans to just 2%. And we all know those polls understate Republican support.
I think it has more to do with upcoming legislation that the SCOTUS is looking at. There are a number of significant rulings coming up. If anything, it probably pertains to her dealings in those matters.
Or, she might have just decided that it's time to retire, and that she can't make it to the end of Trump's term. That's big news as well.