>>341766

Fox has full SOTU

Fox News SOTU Speech Links

President Trump's 2018 State of the Union Address links Part1-4

Part 1 23:14

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVH9PYeNdB8

Part 2 19:46

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=IACkVSSBy5Y

Part 3 18:52

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoKZjlSoyZQ

Part 4 21:57

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoX39jDeqU8

State of the Union 2018 Full 1:45:37

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npz2zEJt2pc

>>341740

>Are you intentionally this 0brained or are you getting paid for this. Doubt the $$$ is worth it.

So you soak up anything you read on an imageboard as infallible without questioning it against prior knowledge? You'd make a perfect cult follower.

>>341825

Bull. Snowden put up HARD evidence PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF THE DEEP STATE and the DEEP STATE was shitting bricks while being severely pissed off about it.

Now you're telling me Snowden is DEEP STATE?

Put up HARD EVIDENCE, or LARP to someone else.

*By hard evidence I'm mean doxx of equal quality & quantity EXPOSING Deep State like he did.

>>341908

> I think

I don't do opinions. I do facts.

Snowden single handedly revealed HARD FACTS that fucked up the DEEP STATE more than ANYONE before or since.

If he was a DEEP STATE operative - why not just go to Russia as a IT contractor in an embassy.

1) He wouldn't be monitored 24/7 as a high value target by FSB

2) He could easily implement "Muh Russian election hacking scam" for the Deep State WITHOUT being monitor

Your Snowden is DEEP STATE fails LOGIC without EVIDENCE.

Y'ALL PISSING ON THE GUY BECAUSE Q MENTIONED HIM AND YOU WANNBE Q-FANS? Really? Q keeps saying THINK for a REASON.

Trump passed a Whistleblower protection law recently, so mentioning Snowden stuff might be a feint against the glowniggers lurking here.

>>341808

>Here's some hard evidence - he supposedly embarrassed the Clintons/Obamas and hasn't been suicided. The opposite - he's a famewhore.

>can't into logic.

By your same logic Trump and Assange are also DEEP STATE for embarrassing Killary & Co.

Where are the documents of EVIDENCE to back up your claim? SNOWDEN delivered the goods, with MANY shots to DAMAGE the DEEP STATE.

I need PROOF if you are claiming he IS Deep State.

>>341926

>He gave hard evidence of no such agency tools the clowns didn't have. Now they do. Coincidence? Needed Russia to believe he was a traitor. You're proving why they did it the way they did. Most believe like you do.

Your logic is, SNOWDEN is Deep State because he DAMAGED the DEEP STATE by exposing the UNCONSTITUTIONAL SURVEILLANCE HE KNEW ABOUT from working AT THE NSA!

Nope still no hard evidence presented. All I see is Q-cult fans fitting a glass shoe on themselves instead of looking for Cinderella.

>>341896

>Are you new? Or a clown?

Here's 50¢ kid, go buy a tie dye t-shirt for your new cult while you suspend your critical thinking.

Trust no one. Question EVERYTHING

>>342058

Of course they would be involved in coruption.

Who would have placed a black mark on Scalia?

Who would discuss wet works of Scalia?

>>342126

>He worked for years. Why now? The timing tingles my intuition.

Did you listen to any of his interviews where he repeatedly ANSWERS THAT VERY QUESTION??! He took an OATH to DEFEND THE CONSITITUTION AGAINST ENEMIES foreign or DOMESTIC!! He saw blatant Constitutional violations and EXPOSED it!

SNOWDEN pissed off the Deep State so badly they STARTED THE CONFLICT WITH UKRAINE AGAINST RUSSIA OVER HIM!!!! FFS!!

>>341901

Q hasn't specifically declared him hostile, only implied it - for reasons we ASSUME, but do not KNOW.

>>342240

Makes sense.

Glad someone here has critical thinking skills.

>>342059

>I don't cancel out information just because it's trusted.

That makes no logical sense whatsoever. In fact, it is so illogical it is inverted.

Female detected.

>>342401

>Clowns control media

>Clowns controls ES

So the media that was calling for Snowden to be killed and crying for his blood as a traitor is on the same side as Snowden who fucked up the Deep State so badly their ass is still bleeding 5 years later?

Sure bud.

>>342451

Neutralize Next