Anonymous ID: e91ed1 Feb. 11, 2018, 2:50 p.m. No.341789   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1818 >>1831 >>1872 >>1898 >>1907 >>1913 >>1951 >>1967 >>2260 >>2313

> What if Snowden was still a Clown?

Keyword "was", maybe Snowden is no longer a clown

 

>Snowden re-tweet:

>‘Speaking truth to power’ a phrase, we often use

 

>@Snowden "Truth To Power"

>Drop "Truth To Power"

>Q

 

When you drop "trust to power" from the retweet, you are left with "Speaking". Snowden is speaking to Q. Someone check the timestamps between Q posts and Snowden tweets.

 

>Snowden's latest tweet:

>Speak not because it is safe, but because it is right.

 

Again we see "speak". Snowden and Q working together?

 

>Why would it be important he was in Russia?

>LEARN!!!!

>Q

 

Again we see keyword "was". Meaning Snowden may not be there anymore.

 

Remember Q's post in Thailand with "E". Maybe they retrieved Snowden from the terminal.

 

What would be important if he was in Russia? Maybe he was there as a double agent and collected the goods on the Russian cabal!