Anonymous ID: 57bf37 Oct. 9, 2018, 6:44 p.m. No.3417460   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3417224 (lb)

True. That said, didn't hear POTUS mention the word [corn] one time tonight, did you?

He did mention ethanol a lot which shouldn't be a surprise to anyone who followed him during the election.

>Promises Made, Promises Kept

Anonymous ID: 57bf37 Oct. 9, 2018, 7:01 p.m. No.3417772   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3417408

If you're concerned about corrosion, check out biobutanol. Unfortunately, BP & DuPont are ahead of everyone with the technology.

 

>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/epas-new-super-fuel-could-spell-trouble-for-ethanol

A top reason to use the fuel is that it is less corrosive than ethanol.

For example, ethanol cannot be shipped in steel pipelines, because it causes them to corrode. Only plastic pipelines can be used, which is not practical for long distances. So it currently is transported by rail and barges.

But biobutanol can be shipped with gasoline and diesel fuel through conventional steel pipes.

 

The fuel also packs more power than ethanol, giving it an energy profile that more closely resembles gasoline. Ethanol is less energy dense, making cars less fuel efficient when it is added to gasoline.