Wanting to calm anons r.e the wheels of justice moving slowly is natural Q, but you really should consider different approaches. You could very easily prove your veracity, whilst also calming a great many minds that these people would be brought to justice. Pick a person who has done a huge amount of evil (Lets say…. Feinstein? Just to pick a random name). Call them out. Say they're going to die for their crimes. And then they have a "car accident", or a "heart attack". It doesn't seem impossible you've done this to Mccain. If you're so heartbroken about "muh law and order" hold a secret trial before you off them. If you're willing to authorise executions, surely the method is a little irrelevant?

And if the democrats etc want to use this as more bait to say "wow that Q is so evil, now he's actively assassinating US senators!!", then A.) it brings more eyes to you, and B.) DECLAS - not just of the FISA, but potentially of more. DECLAS is not a game the democrats would win.

A dead body, called out well in advance, unambiguously, is not the kind of thing anons would ignore. Peoples main concern imho is not so much that things are moving too slowly, it is that they will never, ever be done. You're already going to be withholding so much, keeping so much secret. What is the life of 1 scumbag to prove your veracity, and to prove these scum will die for their crimes?

Hell, why not pick a clinton "suicide", post that, talk about "no such thing as coincidences" briefly, then ensure they meet their end the same way as the clintons victims did? That gives you cover if you need it, and its not like they could dig deep into it without sacrificing queen witch. Why not the same way John Paladino and his wife met their end?