>>3419634
to the contrary, sedevacantists are among the most informed people in the world
>>3419658
Agree. So sad. Also, my feelings exact.
Timing it with POTUS tweets can be programmed and set up.
Notice how anti-POTUS shills reply to POTUS tweets and certain ones always make it to the top? You can program this stuff. People on here even said the tweet timing was the weakest Q proof, so weak it wasn't even a proof.
That's the way to look at it right now.
Even if Q turns out to be a fraud, a joke, even a well meaning larp, the fact is Trump is changing our whole civilization.
Not as much or as fast as we like, but he's doing great things.
In order to do this, you have to build a movement.
People need to be primed.
I happen to know that the last several claimants to the papacy are invalid hersiarchs - antipopes - not legitimate successors of St Peter, not Catholic, not popes at all. Perhaps 50,000 people worldwide believe this, but despite this resistance movement and Catholic restoration and traditionalist movement, most of the world has never even heard of it.
To tell them right now that 99.5% of the world's Catholic bishops are NOT Catholic bishops at all, the priests are not priests, the "Mass" is not a Mass, the prelates are pedophiles, the evil serpent is in the Vatican - similar to what happened during the Arian heresy in the first centuries - well, what would they do? How do you present these facts to an unsuspecting world?
But it HAS to happen.
I hope so, anon.
I will do anything for DJT.
If Q is real, I will do anything to help the plan.
If Q is real, I wonder if it knows who we all are. If so, it knows our positions and abilities and strengths. It has a virtual army here of varied talents.
I am frustrated because I'm not sure exactly what I should be doing right now.
I've done that. I have more accounts than most people have shoes.
I'm ok at that, but I have bigger talents that could be put to use. It's not that I'm looking for something to do I am trying to see how my day job expertise and work can be done for DJT/Q.
No check the various voat boards they debunked that, the guy who was the one who tracked/put together the list of all the sealed indictments left the movement today - they said the numbers were inaccurate, overblown, misrepresented
He never really did, not directly. Pointing a finger at what appeared to be a sign that's not strong enough, that could have been the camera angle. The "17" multiple times, that was good. But there really hasn't been a "Trump points out Q at a rally" that's strong, plain, undeniable. Just hasn't.